Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV Scan results

2019-01-04 Thread Joel Esler (jesler)
Likely not. I would bet that there are some poorly written yara sigs in your environment. Sent from my  iPhone > On Jan 4, 2019, at 07:28, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > > Hi, > > I have the below details > > [root@ clamav]# clamscan --version > ClamAV 0.100.2/25267/Fri Jan 4 06:17:25 2019

[clamav-users] ClamAV Scan results

2019-01-04 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
Hi, I have the below details [root@ clamav]# clamscan --version *ClamAV 0.100.2/25267/Fri Jan 4 06:17:25 2019* [root@ clamav]# rpm -qa | grep clamav clamav-filesystem-0.100.2-2.el7.noarch clamav-update-0.100.2-2.el7.x86_64 clamav-0.100.2-2.el7.x86_64 clamav-lib-0.100.2-2.el7.x86_64 [root@

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV Scan results

2019-01-04 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Do not run clamscan over your entire filesystem. It's a bad idea. In your case clamscan found something looking like a virus in its own signatures, which is hardly surprising and certainly not a sign of an infection. Am 04.01.19 um 13:28 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan: > > when i am running clamscan 

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV Scan results

2019-01-04 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
Yara rules are generally plain-text, meaning that if you scan a Yara rule file using that Yara rule, it may very well alert on itself. If you're going to use yara rules, you don't want to scan your database directory. Doesn't mean it's necessarily a poorly written Yara rule, only that

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV Scan results

2019-01-04 Thread Richard
> Date: Friday, January 04, 2019 17:58:52 +0530 > From: Kaushal Shriyan > > I have the below details > > Is the CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) server infected with > Malware? Please suggest. Thanks in Advance. Slightly off topic, but related to your overall system security, it appears