Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-12 Thread Steve Basford
On Wed, December 7, 2016 5:03 pm, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> You can bypass the warning if desired. > > worst advise you ever have giving here Thanks... but I didn't actually say you *should* ... but browsers do allow you too. In this case the firefox error box was: bugs.clamav.net uses an

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-11 Thread Joel Esler (jesler)
ClamAV is not the only project we run. When you all (or we) discover an issue, I take that information, file a ticket with our operations team, and the issues are resolved as we get to them, just like any other infrastructure. Not only do we run ClamAV, but we run Snort, and entire Talos

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-11 Thread timeless
Reindl Harald wrote: > don't matter - instead of writing a mail that should have been just fixed I'm pretty sure the author was "filing a bug report" and not in a position to fix it... I'd hope that user MLs would not be particularly hostile to users reporting things that need to be fixed... >

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2016 um 00:25 schrieb timeless: Firefox reports: "bugs.clamav.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for bugzilla.clamav.net Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN" You can bypass the warning if desired. (FWIW, Chrome also allows this) Benny

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-11 Thread timeless
> Firefox reports: >> "bugs.clamav.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is >> only valid for bugzilla.clamav.net Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN" >> You can bypass the warning if desired. (FWIW, Chrome also allows this) Benny Pedersen wrote: > worst advise you ever

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
Joel Esler (jesler) skrev den 2016-12-07 18:10: Thanks Steve, I’ve opened a ticket for review. using http:// redirect to the one that works, nice :=) simply kill that dns is the fastest solutiion ___ clamav-users mailing list

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-07 Thread Joel Esler (jesler)
Thanks Steve, I’ve opened a ticket for review. -- Joel Esler | Talos: Manager | jes...@cisco.com On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Steve Basford > wrote: Just a quick one... in case it confuses

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.12.2016 um 17:42 schrieb Steve Basford: Just a quick one... in case it confuses visitors to Bugzilla... Going to https://bugs.clamav.net/ Firefox reports: "bugs.clamav.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for bugzilla.clamav.net Error code:

Re: [clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
Steve Basford skrev den 2016-12-07 17:42: Just a quick one... in case it confuses visitors to Bugzilla... +1 Going to https://bugs.clamav.net/ well spotted ssl error Firefox reports: "bugs.clamav.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for

[clamav-users] bugzilla security certificate

2016-12-07 Thread Steve Basford
Just a quick one... in case it confuses visitors to Bugzilla... Going to https://bugs.clamav.net/ Firefox reports: "bugs.clamav.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for bugzilla.clamav.net Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN" You can bypass the warning if