Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-16 Thread Al Varnell via clamav-users 
I see you figured it out, but just to close this out...

As long as there is another entry on the next line, the a CR is OK. In your 
case ClamAV was looking for a second entry and not finding one it assumed 
malformation.

Sent from my iPad

-Al-
-- 
ClamXAV User

On Jul 16, 2022, at 12:32, joe a  wrote:
> Does that include CR at the end of a line?   Docs suggest multiple ignores 
> in one file, each on it's own line.   Did I misread? (not the first time)
> 
> joe a
> 
>> On 7/16/2022 12:18 AM, Al Varnell via clamav-users wrote:
>> Yes, just make sure you don't have embedded spaces, carriage returns or 
>> other invisible characters.
>> -Al-
>> -- 
>> ClamXAV User
 On Jul 15, 2022, at 8:43 PM, joe a >>> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> That error was corrected, but now the error is "Malformed Database".
>>> 
>>> Is it not a simple text string on a single line?
>>> 
>>> joe a.
>>> 
>>> On 7/15/2022 6:29 PM, joe a wrote:
 My ignorance shows. Created file "/my_install_path/ignore_list.ign2" and 
 get this error:
 "LibClamAV Error: cli_loadign: No signature name provided"
 Is the signature name not "PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1"
 joe a.
 On 7/15/2022 4:59 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
> To turn it off entirely, you would create a file ending in .ign2 and put 
> the signature name in that file.
> 
> I'm not sure there is a good way to do it only for that particular 
> sender, unless you have a way to send those messages to a differently 
> configured ClamAV setup. I don't do a lot of email scanning, so I'm not 
> sure what the limitations are there.
> 
> --Maarten
> 
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:41 PM joe a    >> wrote:
> 
> Thank you.  I believe I understand.
> 
> I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this
> particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping PUA
> checks still enabled for other cases.
> 
> In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my own.
> 
> joe a.
> 
> On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
>  > A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily
>  > malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd
>  > configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.
>  >
>  > For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on
> CharCodeAt()
>  > operations in HTML files.
>  >
>  > VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
>  > TARGET TYPE: HTML
>  > OFFSET: *
>  > DECODED SIGNATURE:
>  > charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^
>  >
>  >
>  > I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with
> default
>  > configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA
>  > detection to be on, it is detected.
>  >
>  > lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
>  > Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]   
> 8.62M/8.62M sigs
>  > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 41/41 
> tasks
>  >
>  > ~/test.html: OK
>  >
>  > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
>  > Known viruses: 8622174
>  > Engine version: 0.105.0
>  > Scanned directories: 0
>  > Scanned files: 1
>  > Infected files: 0
>  > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
>  > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
>  > Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
>  > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
>  > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11
>  >
>  > lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
>  > Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]   
> 8.64M/8.64M sigs
>  > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 41/41 
> tasks
>  >
>  > ~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND
>  >
>  > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
>  > Known viruses: 8637594
>  > Engine version: 0.105.0
>  > Scanned directories: 0
>  > Scanned files: 1
>  > Infected files: 1
>  > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
>  > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
>  > Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
>  > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
>  > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26
>  >
>  > --Maarten
>  >
>  > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a  
>  >
>  >  
>

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-16 Thread joe a 

Apparently resolved by having *only* the signature name on the line.

joe a

On 7/16/2022 3:32 PM, joe a wrote:
Does that include CR at the end of a line?   Docs suggest multiple 
ignores in one file, each on it's own line.   Did I misread? (not the 
first time)


joe a

On 7/16/2022 12:18 AM, Al Varnell via clamav-users wrote:
Yes, just make sure you don't have embedded spaces, carriage returns 
or other invisible characters.


-Al-
--
ClamXAV User

On Jul 15, 2022, at 8:43 PM, joe a > wrote:


That error was corrected, but now the error is "Malformed Database".

Is it not a simple text string on a single line?

joe a.

On 7/15/2022 6:29 PM, joe a wrote:
My ignorance shows. Created file "/my_install_path/ignore_list.ign2" 
and get this error:

"LibClamAV Error: cli_loadign: No signature name provided"
Is the signature name not "PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1"
joe a.
On 7/15/2022 4:59 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
To turn it off entirely, you would create a file ending in .ign2 
and put the signature name in that file.


I'm not sure there is a good way to do it only for that particular 
sender, unless you have a way to send those messages to a 
differently configured ClamAV setup. I don't do a lot of email 
scanning, so I'm not sure what the limitations are there.


--Maarten

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:41 PM joe a  
>> wrote:


    Thank you.  I believe I understand.

    I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this
    particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping 
PUA

    checks still enabled for other cases.

    In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my 
own.


    joe a.

    On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
 > A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not 
necessarily
 > malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your 
clamd

 > configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.
 >
 > For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on
    CharCodeAt()
 > operations in HTML files.
 >
 > VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
 > TARGET TYPE: HTML
 > OFFSET: *
 > DECODED SIGNATURE:
 > charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^
 >
 >
 > I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, 
with

    default
 > configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force 
PUA

 > detection to be on, it is detected.
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>] 
  8.62M/8.62M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: OK
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8622174
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 0
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>] 
  8.64M/8.64M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8637594
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 1
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26
 >
 > --Maarten
 >
 > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a 
mailto:joea-li...@j4computers.com>
    >
 > 
    
 >     Clamav is finding this:
 >
 >     "X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in 
emails

    from a
 >     source I trust (well, it is a professional organization 
anyway).

 >
 >     Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for 
this

 >     particular
 >     client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for 
it at

    all?
 >
 >     Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it 
goes

    away?
 >
 >
 >     ___
 >
 >     clamav-users mailing list
 > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 

    >
   

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-16 Thread joe a 
Does that include CR at the end of a line?   Docs suggest multiple 
ignores in one file, each on it's own line.   Did I misread? (not the 
first time)


joe a

On 7/16/2022 12:18 AM, Al Varnell via clamav-users wrote:
Yes, just make sure you don't have embedded spaces, carriage returns or 
other invisible characters.


-Al-
--
ClamXAV User

On Jul 15, 2022, at 8:43 PM, joe a > wrote:


That error was corrected, but now the error is "Malformed Database".

Is it not a simple text string on a single line?

joe a.

On 7/15/2022 6:29 PM, joe a wrote:
My ignorance shows. Created file "/my_install_path/ignore_list.ign2" 
and get this error:

"LibClamAV Error: cli_loadign: No signature name provided"
Is the signature name not "PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1"
joe a.
On 7/15/2022 4:59 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
To turn it off entirely, you would create a file ending in .ign2 and 
put the signature name in that file.


I'm not sure there is a good way to do it only for that particular 
sender, unless you have a way to send those messages to a 
differently configured ClamAV setup. I don't do a lot of email 
scanning, so I'm not sure what the limitations are there.


--Maarten

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:41 PM joe a  
>> wrote:


    Thank you.  I believe I understand.

    I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this
    particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping PUA
    checks still enabled for other cases.

    In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my own.

    joe a.

    On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
 > A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily
 > malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd
 > configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.
 >
 > For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on
    CharCodeAt()
 > operations in HTML files.
 >
 > VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
 > TARGET TYPE: HTML
 > OFFSET: *
 > DECODED SIGNATURE:
 > charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^
 >
 >
 > I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with
    default
 > configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA
 > detection to be on, it is detected.
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>] 
  8.62M/8.62M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: OK
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8622174
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 0
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>] 
  8.64M/8.64M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8637594
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 1
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26
 >
 > --Maarten
 >
 > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a 
mailto:joea-li...@j4computers.com>
    >
 > 
    
 >     Clamav is finding this:
 >
 >     "X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in emails
    from a
 >     source I trust (well, it is a professional organization 
anyway).

 >
 >     Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for this
 >     particular
 >     client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for it at
    all?
 >
 >     Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it goes
    away?
 >
 >
 >     ___
 >
 >     clamav-users mailing list
 > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 

    >
    
   

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-15 Thread Al Varnell via clamav-users 
Yes, just make sure you don't have embedded spaces, carriage returns or other 
invisible characters.

-Al-
-- 
ClamXAV User

> On Jul 15, 2022, at 8:43 PM, joe a  wrote:
> 
> That error was corrected, but now the error is "Malformed Database".
> 
> Is it not a simple text string on a single line?
> 
> joe a.
> 
> On 7/15/2022 6:29 PM, joe a wrote:
>> My ignorance shows. Created file "/my_install_path/ignore_list.ign2" and get 
>> this error:
>> "LibClamAV Error: cli_loadign: No signature name provided"
>> Is the signature name not "PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1"
>> joe a.
>> On 7/15/2022 4:59 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
>>> To turn it off entirely, you would create a file ending in .ign2 and put 
>>> the signature name in that file.
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure there is a good way to do it only for that particular sender, 
>>> unless you have a way to send those messages to a differently configured 
>>> ClamAV setup. I don't do a lot of email scanning, so I'm not sure what the 
>>> limitations are there.
>>> 
>>> --Maarten
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:41 PM joe a >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you.  I believe I understand.
>>> 
>>> I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this
>>> particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping PUA
>>> checks still enabled for other cases.
>>> 
>>> In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my own.
>>> 
>>> joe a.
>>> 
>>> On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
>>>  > A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily
>>>  > malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd
>>>  > configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.
>>>  >
>>>  > For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on
>>> CharCodeAt()
>>>  > operations in HTML files.
>>>  >
>>>  > VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
>>>  > TARGET TYPE: HTML
>>>  > OFFSET: *
>>>  > DECODED SIGNATURE:
>>>  > charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with
>>> default
>>>  > configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA
>>>  > detection to be on, it is detected.
>>>  >
>>>  > lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
>>>  > Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]   
>>> 8.62M/8.62M sigs
>>>  > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 41/41 
>>> tasks
>>>  >
>>>  > ~/test.html: OK
>>>  >
>>>  > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
>>>  > Known viruses: 8622174
>>>  > Engine version: 0.105.0
>>>  > Scanned directories: 0
>>>  > Scanned files: 1
>>>  > Infected files: 0
>>>  > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
>>>  > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
>>>  > Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
>>>  > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
>>>  > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11
>>>  >
>>>  > lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
>>>  > Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]   
>>> 8.64M/8.64M sigs
>>>  > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 41/41 
>>> tasks
>>>  >
>>>  > ~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND
>>>  >
>>>  > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
>>>  > Known viruses: 8637594
>>>  > Engine version: 0.105.0
>>>  > Scanned directories: 0
>>>  > Scanned files: 1
>>>  > Infected files: 1
>>>  > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
>>>  > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
>>>  > Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
>>>  > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
>>>  > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26
>>>  >
>>>  > --Maarten
>>>  >
>>>  > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a >> 
>>>  > >> >> wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  > Clamav is finding this:
>>>  >
>>>  > "X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in emails
>>> from a
>>>  > source I trust (well, it is a professional organization anyway).
>>>  >
>>>  > Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for this
>>>  > particular
>>>  > client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for it at
>>> all?
>>>  >
>>>  > Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it goes
>>> away?
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > ___
>>>  >
>>>  > clamav-users mailing list
>>>  > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>>> 
>>> >> >
>>>  > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>> 
>>>

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-15 Thread joe a 

That error was corrected, but now the error is "Malformed Database".

Is it not a simple text string on a single line?

joe a.

On 7/15/2022 6:29 PM, joe a wrote:
My ignorance shows. Created file "/my_install_path/ignore_list.ign2" and 
get this error:


"LibClamAV Error: cli_loadign: No signature name provided"

Is the signature name not "PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1"

joe a.

On 7/15/2022 4:59 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
To turn it off entirely, you would create a file ending in .ign2 and 
put the signature name in that file.


I'm not sure there is a good way to do it only for that particular 
sender, unless you have a way to send those messages to a differently 
configured ClamAV setup. I don't do a lot of email scanning, so I'm 
not sure what the limitations are there.


--Maarten

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:41 PM joe a > wrote:


    Thank you.  I believe I understand.

    I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this
    particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping PUA
    checks still enabled for other cases.

    In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my own.

    joe a.

    On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
 > A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily
 > malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd
 > configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.
 >
 > For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on
    CharCodeAt()
 > operations in HTML files.
 >
 > VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
 > TARGET TYPE: HTML
 > OFFSET: *
 > DECODED SIGNATURE:
 > charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^
 >
 >
 > I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with
    default
 > configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA
 > detection to be on, it is detected.
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>]  
 8.62M/8.62M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: OK
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8622174
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 0
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>]  
 8.64M/8.64M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>] 
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8637594
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 1
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26
 >
 > --Maarten
 >
 > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a mailto:joea-li...@j4computers.com>
 > >> wrote:
 >
 >     Clamav is finding this:
 >
 >     "X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in emails
    from a
 >     source I trust (well, it is a professional organization 
anyway).

 >
 >     Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for this
 >     particular
 >     client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for it at
    all?
 >
 >     Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it goes
    away?
 >
 >
 >     ___
 >
 >     clamav-users mailing list
 > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
    
    >
 > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
    
 >     >
 >
 >
 >     Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
 > https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation
    
 >     >
 >
 > https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat
    
 >     

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-15 Thread joe a 
My ignorance shows. Created file "/my_install_path/ignore_list.ign2" and 
get this error:


"LibClamAV Error: cli_loadign: No signature name provided"

Is the signature name not "PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1"

joe a.

On 7/15/2022 4:59 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
To turn it off entirely, you would create a file ending in .ign2 and put 
the signature name in that file.


I'm not sure there is a good way to do it only for that particular 
sender, unless you have a way to send those messages to a differently 
configured ClamAV setup. I don't do a lot of email scanning, so I'm not 
sure what the limitations are there.


--Maarten

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:41 PM joe a > wrote:


Thank you.  I believe I understand.

I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this
particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping PUA
checks still enabled for other cases.

In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my own.

joe a.

On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
 > A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily
 > malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd
 > configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.
 >
 > For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on
CharCodeAt()
 > operations in HTML files.
 >
 > VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
 > TARGET TYPE: HTML
 > OFFSET: *
 > DECODED SIGNATURE:
 > charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^
 >
 >
 > I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with
default
 > configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA
 > detection to be on, it is detected.
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>]  
  8.62M/8.62M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]  
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: OK
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8622174
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 0
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11
 >
 > lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
 > Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>]  
  8.64M/8.64M sigs
 > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]  
41/41 tasks

 >
 > ~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND
 >
 > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
 > Known viruses: 8637594
 > Engine version: 0.105.0
 > Scanned directories: 0
 > Scanned files: 1
 > Infected files: 1
 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
 > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
 > Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
 > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
 > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26
 >
 > --Maarten
 >
 > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a mailto:joea-li...@j4computers.com>
 > >> wrote:
 >
 >     Clamav is finding this:
 >
 >     "X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in emails
from a
 >     source I trust (well, it is a professional organization anyway).
 >
 >     Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for this
 >     particular
 >     client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for it at
all?
 >
 >     Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it goes
away?
 >
 >
 >     ___
 >
 >     clamav-users mailing list
 > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net

>
 > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

 >     >
 >
 >
 >     Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
 > https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

 >     >
 >
 > https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat

 >     >
 >
 >
 > ___
 >
 > clamav-users mailing list
 > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-15 Thread Maarten Broekman via clamav-users 
To turn it off entirely, you would create a file ending in .ign2 and put
the signature name in that file.

I'm not sure there is a good way to do it only for that particular sender,
unless you have a way to send those messages to a differently configured
ClamAV setup. I don't do a lot of email scanning, so I'm not sure what the
limitations are there.

--Maarten

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:41 PM joe a  wrote:

> Thank you.  I believe I understand.
>
> I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this
> particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping PUA
> checks still enabled for other cases.
>
> In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my own.
>
> joe a.
>
> On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
> > A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily
> > malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd
> > configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.
> >
> > For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on CharCodeAt()
> > operations in HTML files.
> >
> > VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
> > TARGET TYPE: HTML
> > OFFSET: *
> > DECODED SIGNATURE:
> > charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^
> >
> >
> > I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with default
> > configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA
> > detection to be on, it is detected.
> >
> > lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
> > Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]8.62M/8.62M
> sigs
> > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]   41/41 tasks
> >
> > ~/test.html: OK
> >
> > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
> > Known viruses: 8622174
> > Engine version: 0.105.0
> > Scanned directories: 0
> > Scanned files: 1
> > Infected files: 0
> > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
> > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
> > Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
> > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
> > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11
> >
> > lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
> > Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]8.64M/8.64M
> sigs
> > Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]   41/41 tasks
> >
> > ~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND
> >
> > --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
> > Known viruses: 8637594
> > Engine version: 0.105.0
> > Scanned directories: 0
> > Scanned files: 1
> > Infected files: 1
> > Data scanned: 0.00 MB
> > Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
> > Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
> > Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
> > End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26
> >
> > --Maarten
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a  > > wrote:
> >
> > Clamav is finding this:
> >
> > "X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in emails from a
> > source I trust (well, it is a professional organization anyway).
> >
> > Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for this
> > particular
> > client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for it at all?
> >
> > Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it goes away?
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
> > clamav-users mailing list
> > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 
> > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
> > 
> >
> >
> > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> > https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation
> > 
> >
> > https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat
> > 
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
> > clamav-users mailing list
> > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
> >
> >
> > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> > https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation
> >
> > https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat
> ___
>
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>
>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation
>
> https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat
>
___

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-15 Thread joe a 

Thank you.  I believe I understand.

I was actually looking for a way to turn off checking for this 
particular "PUA", hopefully just for this sender, while keeping PUA 
checks still enabled for other cases.


In the past I've not had great success searching entirely on my own.

joe a.

On 7/15/2022 4:34 PM, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily 
malicious. You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd 
configuration has "DetectPUA" set to no.


For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on CharCodeAt() 
operations in HTML files.


VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
TARGET TYPE: HTML
OFFSET: *
DECODED SIGNATURE:
charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^


I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with default 
configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA 
detection to be on, it is detected.


lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>]    8.62M/8.62M sigs
Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]       41/41 tasks

~/test.html: OK

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 8622174
Engine version: 0.105.0
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 0.00 MB
Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11

lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
Loading:     6s, ETA:   0s [>]    8.64M/8.64M sigs
Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]       41/41 tasks

~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 8637594
Engine version: 0.105.0
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data scanned: 0.00 MB
Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26

--Maarten

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a > wrote:


Clamav is finding this:

"X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in emails from a
source I trust (well, it is a professional organization anyway).

Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for this
particular
client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for it at all?

Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it goes away?


___

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users



Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation


https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat



___

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat

___

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat

Re: [clamav-users] PUA detected. False Positive?

2022-07-15 Thread Maarten Broekman via clamav-users 
A "PUA" is a "potentially unwanted application", not necessarily malicious.
You can disable PUA checks by ensuring that your clamd configuration has
"DetectPUA" set to no.

For reference, the signature is looking for bitwise math on CharCodeAt()
operations in HTML files.

VIRUS NAME: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1
TARGET TYPE: HTML
OFFSET: *
DECODED SIGNATURE:
charcodeat({WILDCARD_ANY_STRING(LENGTH<=5)})^


I created a bogus test file that matches the signature and, with default
configuration settings, it is not detected. But when I force PUA detection
to be on, it is detected.

lothlorien:~$ clamscan test.html
Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]8.62M/8.62M sigs

Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]   41/41 tasks

~/test.html: OK

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 8622174
Engine version: 0.105.0
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 0.00 MB
Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
Time: 9.865 sec (0 m 9 s)
Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:01
End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:11

lothlorien:~$ clamscan --detect-pua=yes test.html
Loading: 6s, ETA:   0s [>]8.64M/8.64M sigs

Compiling:   2s, ETA:   0s [>]   41/41 tasks

~/test.html: PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1 FOUND

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 8637594
Engine version: 0.105.0
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data scanned: 0.00 MB
Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
Time: 9.614 sec (0 m 9 s)
Start Date: 2022:07:15 16:31:17
End Date:   2022:07:15 16:31:26

--Maarten

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:02 PM joe a  wrote:

> Clamav is finding this:
>
> "X-Virus-Status: Infected (PUA.Win.Trojan.Xored-1)" in emails from a
> source I trust (well, it is a professional organization anyway).
>
> Is there any way to tell clamav not to run the check for this particular
> client and this particular "trojan"? Just not check for it at all?
>
> Or should I submit it as a "False positive" and hope it goes away?
>
>
> ___
>
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>
>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation
>
> https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat
>
___

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat