> So I would like to ask, does bytecode have access to its environment
> (like ActiveX unfortunately did) and, how well is bytecode sandboxed?
Well, first of all, only bytecode signatures published by Cisco/Talos
are considered "trusted" and will run by default. You would have to
manually specify
I've always been leery of executable code that gets downloaded "behind
the scenes" and then executed for whatever purpose. In the "old days",
people were warned against downloading random software and then
executing it. How that's become at least half of what we do on a daily
basis -- in our browse
Micah & Scott,
Thank you for the replies, you answered exactly what I was thinking
too based on posts referring to the built-in improvements and hush on
llvm.
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mai
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 05:59:05 PM Micah Snyder wrote:
> Sorry about the broken links on the website and in the clamav-faq manual
> pages. Our web dev team is actively working on integrating the newly
> remodeled user manual into the website.
>
> The bytecode interpreter was nonfunctional
Sorry about the broken links on the website and in the clamav-faq manual pages.
Our web dev team is actively working on integrating the newly remodeled user
manual into the website.
The bytecode interpreter was nonfunctional for a long time but was fixed a few
years ago. This is why LLVM was p
