Re: Current Mauve status

2004-02-25 Thread Michael Koch
Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2004 16:30 schrieb Archie Cobbs: > Hi, > > I'm trying to resolve some Mauve test failures with a new JVM (JC) > and am wondering which failures are "expected" (i.e., known bugs > in Classpath) and which are specific to this JVM. Unfortunately the > "Mauve status" section of

Current Mauve status

2004-02-25 Thread Archie Cobbs
Hi, I'm trying to resolve some Mauve test failures with a new JVM (JC) and am wondering which failures are "expected" (i.e., known bugs in Classpath) and which are specific to this JVM. Unfortunately the "Mauve status" section of the website is down. Does anyone have the output of a "normal" Mauv

FOSDEM slides

2004-02-25 Thread Sascha Brawer
>If other presentations are also online, please post them to the list. Java Security: How Free Software Is Secured Using the Java Language After a general introduction to why Java seems a reasonable choice for writing large and robust free software packages, the t

RE: Object serialization patch

2004-02-25 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > In that case I'm proposing this patch. I have replaced the > type checks in setXXXField by a type check in > ObjectStreamClass.setClass by invoking a new method > ObjectStreamField.checkFieldType. Here I'm only checking > that the field is really assignable with a value

Re: [Article] Sun Fires Back over Open Source Java Accusations

2004-02-25 Thread Jens Lehmann
Tom Tromey wrote: "Patrik" == Patrik Reali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Patrik> OSNews has some discussion on Sun's answer to ESR request to make Java Patrik> open source. Patrik> IMO, while it would be helpful if Sun opened their source, we don't r