Re: Transvirtual Adds Visual J++ Features to Kaffe

1999-07-12 Thread Christoph Toshok
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote: Transvirtual has added support to Kaffe for the MS Visual J++ features that the court ordered MS to remove from that product due to MS's contract with Sun. See: so, what exactly are these features? the delegate stuff? extra bytecodes? please to give pointer :)

Re: Initial implementation of java.lang.ref

1999-07-12 Thread Christoph Toshok
Jochen Hoenicke wrote: Hello, I have just committed the jdk 1.2 Reference classes java.lang.ref. They don't have any special functionality. This should be AFAIK implemented by the garbage collection. unfortunately, the JDK1.2 Reference classes do a lot more -- they actually have some code

Re: 0.01 release status?

1999-06-10 Thread Christoph Toshok
"Aaron M. Renn" wrote: Stuart Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: A while back Aaron posted about working on an 0.01 release which would be feature-rich enough to encourage some outside use of Classpath. I was wondering what the showstoppers are for making such a release, and what

japhar + classpath works

1999-04-03 Thread Christoph Toshok
I made some minor fixes, and now japhar + classpath works for the japhar tests that I tried. :) xtoph

japhar and classpath work

1999-03-31 Thread Christoph Toshok
it's strange. have classes (like java.lang.reflect.Method and java.io.FileDescriptor) changed their native methods and/or the way they deal with their native state? i'm fixing problems as I find them, and getting further and further towards executing hello world with the current japhar and

Re: Free Swing?

1999-03-30 Thread Christoph Toshok
Brian Jones wrote: Maksim Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, I'm not sure that providing a plug-in replacement is a particularly good idea (though I wouldn't complain if someone did it) since it would take huge resources and swing isn't particaulrly brillant anyway (nice yes - great

Re: RMS comments on the new Sun JDK license

1999-02-25 Thread Christoph Toshok
John Keiser wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just ran across this today, it's been lifted from URL:http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-02/lw-02-letters.html ... But there's a better alternative: Forget Sun, and use free Java implementations such as Kaffe and

merging the JDK_12_BRANCH back onto the head

1999-01-29 Thread Christoph Toshok
Now that 0.07 is out (ack, need to update the webpage! :) I'm thinking of merging the JDK_12_BRANCH back onto the head. The code there is faster than what's on the trunk, runs javac from both the JDK1.1 classes.zip and the JDK1.2fcs distribution's .jar files, deals with exceptions properly, and

Re: native libs

1998-11-10 Thread Christoph Toshok
John Keiser wrote: From: Bernd Kreimeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'd install the libraries in the JVM specific "lib" directory. Kaffe 1.0b1 use of the JDK 1.2 Invocation API: vm_args.librarypath = "/opt/local/share/kaffe/lib/i386-linux/"; this isn't the 1.2 invocation API.