Now I have a little bit time, to reply to your comment (I will also write
this reply in the forum at
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18036tstart=0 ).
Yeah thanks. Please also include my other replies if you see fit.
Done.
I think three different OpenSource implementations
I think three different OpenSource implementations would be the
worst case scenario, if Sun makes its Java OpenSource.
FWIW, I tend to agree overall. Our experience merging libgcj with
classpath was that the merge improved both -- sometimes the libgcj
code was better, sometimes the classpath
theUser BL wrote:
And in which part is the GNU Classpath implementation better then
Suns implementation? (from the technical point of view, not from
the license side) ?
You might like to look at http://builder.classpath.org/xml/SAXTest/
which shows the XML SAX API conformance status of
Chris Burdess wrote:
Yes. This vexes me greatly, when there is pressure from the community
to reproduce a bug-for-bug compatible class library, i.e. that we
should try to code to match Sun's implementation instead of coding a
good, bug-free implementation of the specification. But, as you
Hi Roman.
Now I have a little bit time, to reply to your comment (I will also write
this reply in the forum at
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18036tstart=0 ).
What I'd find best for Java is something like we have in the BSD world.
Friendly competing communities, with code
Hi Patrick,
Now I have a little bit time, to reply to your comment (I will also
write this reply in the forum at
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18036tstart=0 ).
Yeah thanks. Please also include my other replies if you see fit.
What I'd find best for Java is something like
And in which part is the GNU Classpath implementation better then Suns
implementation? (from the technical point of view, not from the license
side) ?
Grab the CORBA COST testing suite from SourceForge and try on Sun's
implementation. This mean alone helps against this kind of pride
Il giorno mar, 05/09/2006 alle 18.46 +, theUser BL ha scritto:
I think three different OpenSource implementations would be the worst case
scenario, if Sun makes its Java OpenSource.
Ans I also think, that Suns sees so like I. And I think they want to make it
OpenSource, to have _not_
Hi Patrick,
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 13:11 +, theUser BL wrote:
Have a look at
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18036tstart=0
there I have written a qustion at Mark and other developers.
It would be nice and I would be happy, if you answer it.
Seems you need to have to
Hi Patrick.
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 13:11 +, theUser BL wrote:
Have a look at
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18036tstart=0
there I have written a qustion at Mark and other developers.
IMO, it is not necessary and feasible to have The One OSS/F Java
implementation. That's
Seems you need to have to register for some sort of account on that site
to post there, but feel free to quote or redistribute my response if you
want.
Yes. I have now posted also your answer in this forum (and this reply).
Sun has in the past chosen to use and create licenses like SISSL and
Interesting quote about the CDDL from /.:
quote
Not to worry. Firefox is available under GPL. MPL was never widely used
outside of Mozilla, and that chiefly in the period before Mozilla was
widely used. At that, it's a better license than the CDDL. The CDDL
specificly allows distribution of
Have a look at
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18036tstart=0
there I have written a qustion at Mark and other developers.
It would be nice and I would be happy, if you answer it.
Greatings
theuserbl
13 matches
Mail list logo
