David Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian,
>
> Try the attached code instead - which properly synchronizes between
> the two threads to ensure that the thread to be stopped actually
> starts executing.
Thanks David, I shouldn't have tried that hack I guess.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <[EMAIL
Brian,
Try the attached code instead - which properly synchronizes between
the two threads to ensure that the thread to be stopped actually
starts executing. From what I observed the thread never got a chance
to run and so was stopped before it really got started. This can
happen because:
a) star
Hi,
I'm trying to close a few bugs for the 0.06 release. I've replied to
bug 2685,
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2685&group_id=85,
and need someone to help me understand how to correct my test case.
The test case is attached to the bug report and this e
3 matches
Mail list logo