Hi,
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 00:54, Brian Jones wrote:
Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would certainly made this into three commits but would have just used
the given separate ChangeLog entries as shown since eacht entry is
clearly a group of changes that is related.
My typical
Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 13 Aug 2003 01:05:31 +0200:
I would really like everybody to follow the ChangeLog entry guidelines
given in:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/changelogs/guile-changelogs_3.html
Here's a question about ChangeLog entries: Would it make sense to have
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 08:05, Sascha Brawer wrote:
Here's a question about ChangeLog entries: Would it make sense to have
separate commits (and thus ChangeLog entries) for unrelated changes?
Yes for completely unrelated changes they should be committed seperately
(especially when doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 14. Juli 2003 09:46 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 07:50, Michael Koch wrote:
* java/net/ServerSocket.java,
java/net/Socket.java: New versions from libgcj.
If possible I would like to see the original
4 matches
Mail list logo
