Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?

2007-08-02 Thread Chris Burdess
Andrew Haley wrote: From my POV, the first priority is a fully free OpenJDK, running on all the platforms we care about. We have only Classpath code into IcedTea where there are missing parts of OpenJDK. And what platforms /do/ we care about? -- Chris Burdess

Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?

2007-08-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Chris Burdess writes: Andrew Haley wrote: From my POV, the first priority is a fully free OpenJDK, running on all the platforms we care about. We have only Classpath code into IcedTea where there are missing parts of OpenJDK. And what platforms /do/ we care about? An interesting

Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?

2007-08-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Robert Schuster writes: on IRC #classpath I read a lot of interesting things are happening around IcedTea and Classpath. People put Classpath stuff into IcedTea, Cacao gets support for the latter. Fedora people try to get this working on all arches (that GCJ supports :) ). I am

IcedTea - Where is this going to head?

2007-08-02 Thread Robert Schuster
Hi, on IRC #classpath I read a lot of interesting things are happening around IcedTea and Classpath. People put Classpath stuff into IcedTea, Cacao gets support for the latter. Fedora people try to get this working on all arches (that GCJ supports :) ). I am wondering what the goals of all these