I checked in the aforementioned assertion patch.
2005-07-25 Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* native/jni/classpath/native_state.c: add assertion for object type
-Archie
__
Archie Cobbs *CTO, Awa
Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>> Doesn't GetObjectClass change the state of env? If that's the case, it
>> maybe shouldn't be an assert.
>
>
> Not sure what you mean.. but there is a bug: we need to delete the
> local native reference obtained by calling GetObjectClass.
>
> Attac
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Doesn't GetObjectClass change the state of env? If that's the case, it
maybe shouldn't be an assert.
Not sure what you mean.. but there is a bug: we need to delete the
local native reference obtained by calling GetObjectClass.
Attached is a better patch.
Thanks,
-Archie
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Archie Cobbs wrote:
With Classpath 0.16, trying to run a very simple Swing demo under JCVM,
I get a JNI assertion failure in a call to GetIntField(), because the
object
type and the fieldID are not compatible:
gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/[EMAIL PROTECTED] not instance of
Archie Cobbs wrote:
With Classpath 0.16, trying to run a very simple Swing demo under JCVM,
I get a JNI assertion failure in a call to GetIntField(), because the
object
type and the fieldID are not compatible:
gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/[EMAIL PROTECTED] not instance of
gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk
Archie Cobbs wrote:
With Classpath 0.16, trying to run a very simple Swing demo under JCVM,
I get a JNI assertion failure in a call to GetIntField(), because the
object
type and the fieldID are not compatible:
gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/[EMAIL PROTECTED] not instance of
gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk
With Classpath 0.16, trying to run a very simple Swing demo under JCVM,
I get a JNI assertion failure in a call to GetIntField(), because the object
type and the fieldID are not compatible:
gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/[EMAIL PROTECTED] not instance of
gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkGenericPeer
Here is
7 matches
Mail list logo
