idea in my opinion. Have you looked at graydon's junit mauve
bridge at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2003-q4/msg3.html ?
I hadn't seen Graydon's bridge class, thanks for the link (and I should
do more research next time). Looking over it, it has the advantage
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:40:55AM +, David Gilbert wrote:
> I didn't get any feedback about this...anyone think it is a good/bad idea?
excellent idea in my opinion. Have you looked at graydon's junit mauve
bridge at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2003-q4/msg3.
hello Tom,
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 12:01, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Raif" == Raif S Naffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> I think we ought to change Mauve to use JUnit as well...
>
> Raif> do you see this as a new module u
>>>>> "Raif" == Raif S Naffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think we ought to change Mauve to use JUnit as well...
Raif> do you see this as a new module under the Mauve CVS, say "junit" or a
Raif> folder-hierarchy under the current "m
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 01:05 +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Given that the majority (all?) of current tests in Mauve is under the
> GPL, without a single copyright holder, I assume, and the license of
> JUnit is incompatible with the GPL
IANAL, but my theory is that this is irrelevant u
On Saturday 24 December 2005 09:15, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Raif" == Raif S Naffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Raif> the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit
> Raif> instead. this would make it easier to test using an
.
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as the Native
Eclipse.
is this idea worth discussing or should we consider that for the
forseeable future Mauve only is the test framework for GNU Classpath?
Hi
> those involved in this work.
> >
> > the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
> > this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as the Native
> > Eclipse.
> >
> > is this idea worth discussing or should we consider tha
On 12/23/05, Raif S. Naffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
> this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as the Native
> Eclipse.
As an outsider I would love to see that. It would make it easier
Raif S. Naffah wrote:
hello all,
soon the GNU Crypto classes will be moving to Classpath. i thought now
is the right time to bring this subject since it makes it easier for
those involved in this work.
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would
>>>>> "Raif" == Raif S Naffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raif> the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit
Raif> instead. this would make it easier to test using an IDE such as
Raif> the Native Eclipse.
Raif> is this idea worth di
hello all,
soon the GNU Crypto classes will be moving to Classpath. i thought now
is the right time to bring this subject since it makes it easier for
those involved in this work.
the proposal is to port the GNU Crypto Mauve tests to use JUnit instead.
this would make it easier to test
Hi list,
I was trying to move the libjdepend-java debian package to our 'main'
section (compiled with free tools) and it compiled fine with kaffe. I
thought it was a good idea to also run the junit tests against the free
compiled version and I got two failures.
Attached is the diff of
13 matches
Mail list logo
