Andrew Haley writes:
Andrew Haley writes:
Robert Lougher writes:
Had a quick look, and in Classpath-0.93 java.util.AbstractMap contains
a class BasicMapEntry which implements getValue(). BasicMapEntry is
package-private. This isn't accessible outside the package.
Robert Lougher writes:
Had a quick look, and in Classpath-0.93 java.util.AbstractMap contains
a class BasicMapEntry which implements getValue(). BasicMapEntry is
package-private. This isn't accessible outside the package.
In CVS HEAD, this has changed and java.util.AbstractMap
Andrew Haley writes:
Robert Lougher writes:
Had a quick look, and in Classpath-0.93 java.util.AbstractMap contains
a class BasicMapEntry which implements getValue(). BasicMapEntry is
package-private. This isn't accessible outside the package.
In CVS HEAD, this has
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:53 +0200, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Grrr, I hate this access checks. I'll try to fix that _again_.
This seems to be pretty subtle and we found multiple runtimes (jamvm,
cacao, gcj and kaffe at least) that seem to get this wrong. And the
online documentation is not very
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 23:12 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Attached is a simplified test case (3 classes - c1 is in package p1, c2
and c3 are in package p2, c2 is not public, p1.c1 is the entry point)
that should throw an IllegalAccessException on the line:
m.invoke(o, new Object[0]);
Sun's RI
Hi Mark,
On 4/8/07, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:53 +0200, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Grrr, I hate this access checks. I'll try to fix that _again_.
This seems to be pretty subtle and we found multiple runtimes (jamvm,
cacao, gcj and kaffe at least) that
Mark Wielaard writes:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:53 +0200, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Grrr, I hate this access checks. I'll try to fix that _again_.
This seems to be pretty subtle and we found multiple runtimes (jamvm,
cacao, gcj and kaffe at least) that seem to get this wrong. And the
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 22:41 +0100, Robert Lougher wrote:
Strangely enough, I _did_ fix this in JamVM 1.4.4, but then removed
the checks again in JamVM 1.4.5!
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jamvm/jamvm/src/reflect.c.diff?r1=1.9r2=1.10
If I remember the reason for removing it
Hi,
On 4/8/07, Robert Lougher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 4/8/07, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:53 +0200, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Grrr, I hate this access checks. I'll try to fix that _again_.
This seems to be pretty subtle and we found
Robert Lougher writes:
Anyway, I've found what it broke and my original analysis. After
putting this in, BeanShell GUI stopped working with JamVM. This was
found during 0.93 testing:
...
I don't know where the problem lies. The class
java.util.Hashtable$HashEntry is
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 23:00 +0100, Robert Lougher wrote:
Anyway, I've found what it broke and my original analysis. After
putting this in, BeanShell GUI stopped working with JamVM. This was
found during 0.93 testing:
http://www.mail-archive.com/classpath@gnu.org/msg13811.html
I did an
Hi Twisti,
On 4/8/07, Christian Thalinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 23:00 +0100, Robert Lougher wrote:
Anyway, I've found what it broke and my original analysis. After
putting this in, BeanShell GUI stopped working with JamVM. This was
found during 0.93 testing:
Hi Andrew,
On 4/8/07, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Lougher writes:
Anyway, I've found what it broke and my original analysis. After
putting this in, BeanShell GUI stopped working with JamVM. This was
found during 0.93 testing:
...
I don't know where the
Hi,
On 4/9/07, Robert Lougher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 4/8/07, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Lougher writes:
Anyway, I've found what it broke and my original analysis. After
putting this in, BeanShell GUI stopped working with JamVM. This was
found
14 matches
Mail list logo
