Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I'd like to suggest that we merge the generics branch to HEAD, following
the branch for 0.93 (making 0.93 the last non-generics version of GNU
Classpath, and 0.94 the first generics one).
+1, for sure.
Audrius
Andrew John Hughes writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that:
>
> a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
> to trunk
> b) there is another Free 1.5 compiler in the form of Sun's javac
> c) most VMs have support for at least some of the 1.5 native stuff
>
> I'd like t
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Hi everyone,
Now that:
a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
to trunk
b) there is another Free 1.5 compiler in the form of Sun's javac
c) most VMs have support for at least some of the 1.5 native stuff
I'd like to
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 06:22:19PM +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that:
>
> a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
> to trunk
> b) there is another Free 1.5 compiler in the form of Sun's javac
> c) most VMs have support for at least some of the 1
Hi Andrew,
Sounds good to me!;)
David Fu
--
firecat server-side javascript webserver
http://firecat.nihonsoft.org
http://blog.netbeans.jp/roller/page/fchoong
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that:
>
> a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
> to trunk
> b) there is another Free 1.
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that:
>
> a) gcj has branched for 4.2 and the gcj-eclipse branch is moving
> to trunk
> b) there is another Free 1.5 compiler in the form of Sun's javac
> c) most VMs have support for at least some of the 1.5 native stuff
>
> I'd like to suggest t
6 matches
Mail list logo
