On 19/03/2008, Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Schuster wrote:
> > >> Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a
> > >> dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to have a dependency on
> > >> classpath. How is this not circular?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
Hi,
On 3/19/08, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
> > There is a classpath installation in macports, it just needs someone
> > using that platform to take care of it, and update it to 0.97.1.
>
> In fact, I'm working on the classpath pac
On Mar 19, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
There is a classpath installation in macports, it just needs someone
using that platform to take care of it, and update it to 0.97.1.
In fact, I'm working on the classpath packaging for the Fink project,
and I'm trying to update it to 0.97.1.
Robert Lougher wrote:
Yes, there's a huge number of options. I wasn't advocating using
JamVM, just giving an example of what I do :)
I think we should simply encourage people to use the prebuilt glibj.zip
file from builder for their respective version when bootstrapping
Classpath on a new pl
Chris Burdess wrote:
> Robert Schuster wrote:
Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a
dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to have a dependency on
classpath. How is this not circular?
>>> It is circular. Such is life with Java (OpenJDK also nee
Robert Schuster wrote:
> >> Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a
> >> dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to have a dependency on
> >> classpath. How is this not circular?
> >>
> >
> > It is circular. Such is life with Java (OpenJDK also needs a JDK to
> > co
Hi.
Andrew John Hughes schrieb:
>> Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a
>> dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to have a dependency on
>> classpath. How is this not circular?
>>
>
> It is circular. Such is life with Java (OpenJDK also needs a JDK to
> compil
Hi Dalibor,
On 3/19/08, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trevor Harmon wrote:
> > Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a
> > dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to have a dependency on
> > classpath. How is this not circular?
> You can pass in a prebuilt
Trevor Harmon wrote:
Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a
dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to have a dependency on
classpath. How is this not circular?
You can pass in a prebuilt glibj.zip to configure, without having to
mess around with ecj on your target
Robert Lougher wrote:
P.S. Changing the subject, this is one of my concerns with the change
to the VM interface for the new VM reflection classes. If JamVM moves
to the new interface it breaks the ability to use JamVM/Classpath-0.92
as a bootstrap...
I don't think that's a huge problem:
*
Hi,
On 3/19/08, Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, most distros should ship with old versions of Classpath and a VM
> so you should be able to use that to run ecj (it doesn't require 1.5
> features, which is where the problem comes in). Likewise, you can
> build pre-0.95 versi
Hi Andrew,
On 3/19/08, Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/03/2008, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> >
> > > You need an ecj.tar
> >
> >
> > What version of ecj do I need for the latest classpath? Is 3.1.2 good
>
On 19/03/2008, Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/03/2008, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> >
> > > You need an ecj.tar
> >
> >
> > What version of ecj do I need for the latest classpath? Is 3.1.2 good
> >
On 19/03/2008, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
>
> > You need an ecj.tar
>
>
> What version of ecj do I need for the latest classpath? Is 3.1.2 good
> enough?
3.2 works for definite. I seem to recall 3.1.2 working but don't
quote me
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
You need an ecj.tar
What version of ecj do I need for the latest classpath? Is 3.1.2 good
enough?
and a working jamvm.
Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a
dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to hav
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 17/03/2008, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to compile Classpath 0.97.1 on Mac OS X 10.5.2, which
has Java 1.5.0_13 installed. My configure options are:
--disable-dependency-tracking --disable-gtk-peer --disable-gconf-peer
--disable-
On 18/03/2008, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> >> In that case, the classpath sources should have the old jikes stuff
> >> stripped out. There are still references to jikes that lead users
> >> like
> >> myself to think that
On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
In that case, the classpath sources should have the old jikes stuff
stripped out. There are still references to jikes that lead users
like
myself to think that jikes is still supported. For instance, the
configure script still accepts the
On 17/03/2008, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> > The jikes Java to bytecode compiler only supports Java 1.4 and has
> > been unable to build Classpath since the introduction of generics in
> > release 0.95 (April 23rd 2007).
>
>
> In
On Mar 17, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
The jikes Java to bytecode compiler only supports Java 1.4 and has
been unable to build Classpath since the introduction of generics in
release 0.95 (April 23rd 2007).
In that case, the classpath sources should have the old jikes stuff
stripp
Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Mar 16, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Version 1.5 of Sun's javac is broken. Please use an alternate
compiler, such as ecj, or a newer version of javac, such as OpenJDK
javac or the version that comes with JDK 1.6.
What about jikes? I guess the 0.97.1 rel
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 17:50 -0700, Trevor Harmon wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > Version 1.5 of Sun's javac is broken. Please use an alternate
> > compiler, such as ecj, or a newer version of javac, such as OpenJDK
> > javac or the version that comes with JDK
On Mar 16, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Version 1.5 of Sun's javac is broken. Please use an alternate
compiler, such as ecj, or a newer version of javac, such as OpenJDK
javac or the version that comes with JDK 1.6.
What about jikes? I guess the 0.97.1 release no longer works w
On 17/03/2008, Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to compile Classpath 0.97.1 on Mac OS X 10.5.2, which
> has Java 1.5.0_13 installed. My configure options are:
>
> --disable-dependency-tracking --disable-gtk-peer --disable-gconf-peer
> --disable-plugin --enable-j
24 matches
Mail list logo
