Re: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-02 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 28 Apr 2006, at 10:26, Jeroen Frijters wrote: Andrew John Hughes wrote: So I see, although you didn't post a patch. I did. http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2006- April/00 1837.html In general, can everyone please check against the generics branch in future if

Re: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> This can be easily done using: Andrew> http://fuseyism.com/java/comparison/generics-classpath-compare.html Andrew> which is updated nightly. This would be a good thing to run on builder.classpath.org. Tom

RE: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Edwin Steiner wrote: > I'm testing cacao with an "ecj -target 1.5"-compiled classpath in > addition to the jikes-compiled classpath I normally use. With ecj I > ran into a bootstrapping problem that made both cacao and jamvm fail: > > What makes the difference is that ecj uses StringBuilder instea

RE: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Andrew John Hughes wrote: > Edwin Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > A solution to this is to use VMSystem.arraycopy instead of > > System.arraycopy. (StringBuffer already does that.) [...] > Yes, I know about this from when I was first bootstrapping > the generics branch about 18 months

Re: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:03:39 +0200 Edwin Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello classpath hackers! > > I'm testing cacao with an "ecj -target 1.5"-compiled classpath in > addition to the jikes-compiled classpath I normally use. With ecj I > ran into a bootstrapping problem that made both caca

Re: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:47:32 +0200 "Jeroen Frijters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > Edwin Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > A solution to this is to use VMSystem.arraycopy instead of > > > System.arraycopy. (StringBuffer already does that.) > [...] > > Ye

Re: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:26:19 +0200 "Jeroen Frijters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > So I see, although you didn't post a patch. > > I did. > http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2006-April/001837.html > My apologies; it doesn't appear to have co

Re: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:47:32 +0200 "Jeroen Frijters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > Edwin Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > A solution to this is to use VMSystem.arraycopy instead of > > > System.arraycopy. (StringBuffer already does that.) > [...] > > Ye

RE: bootstrapping problem with StringBuilder

2006-05-01 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Andrew John Hughes wrote: > So I see, although you didn't post a patch. I did. http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2006-April/00 1837.html > In general, can everyone please check against the generics > branch in future if there is something that could possibly > have been