Hi,
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Brian Jones wrote:
I'm not following Harmony too closely (so let me talk out my ... a
moment) but let me see if I understand it so far. Harmony is:
1) Writing their own class libraries (based on email about japi
comparisons)
2) Writing their own JVM (which I
Philippe Laporte wrote:
Does this library have (ie is in a perfect state) all the security and
signing stuff that classpath lacks right now? How about the security audit?
I'm not sure exactly what it has, as I've been too busy to
take a good look at it. It's all visible for inspection via
the
On Mar 9, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Philippe Laporte wrote:
Does this library have (ie is in a perfect state) all the security
and signing stuff that classpath lacks right now? How about the
security audit?
I don't understand (and have been largely ignoring this thread, so I
may have missed
Casey Marshall wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Philippe Laporte wrote:
Does this library have (ie is in a perfect state) all the security
and signing stuff that classpath lacks right now? How about the
security audit?
I don't understand (and have been largely ignoring this thread,
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Philippe Laporte wrote:
Casey Marshall wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Philippe Laporte wrote:
Does this library have (ie is in a perfect state) all the
security and signing stuff that classpath lacks right now? How
about the security audit?
I don't
Casey == Casey Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Casey I don't understand (and have been largely ignoring this thread, so I
Casey may have missed some context). What do you think is missing from
Casey Classpath's security infrastructure?
Some of the discussion involved gcjwebplugin. There's a
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:54 -0800, Casey Marshall wrote:
Nope. Classpath has had support for *verifying* signed jar files for
some time now; we do currently lack support for *creating* signed jar
files (i.e., we don't have a replacement for `jarsigner' yet) but I
think Raif said he
On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:51 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:54 -0800, Casey Marshall wrote:
Nope. Classpath has had support for *verifying* signed jar files for
some time now; we do currently lack support for *creating* signed jar
files (i.e., we don't have a replacement for
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 06:49:12PM -0800, Casey Marshall wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:51 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:54 -0800, Casey Marshall wrote:
Nope. Classpath has had support for *verifying* signed jar files for
some time now; we do currently lack support for
9 matches
Mail list logo
