RE: better javap comparisons

1998-11-16 Thread John Keiser
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Jones I think I've fixed the majority of problems in the script at this point. I've run it using a 1.2 classes.zip now and those results are available at

Re: better javap comparisons

1998-11-16 Thread Stuart Ballard
John Keiser wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Jones I think I've fixed the majority of problems in the script at this point. I've run it using a 1.2 classes.zip now and those results are available at

Re: better javap comparisons

1998-11-16 Thread Wes Biggs
John Keiser wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stuart Ballard FWIW, I strongly agree with John about protected classes. Protected members of a class *ARE* part of the public API in Java. I think you guys are debating different points. I hope no

RE: better javap comparisons

1998-11-16 Thread John Keiser
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Jones Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FWIW, I strongly agree with John about protected classes. Protected members of a class *ARE* part of the public API in Java. ClassLoader from 1.2 has a number of

Re: better javap comparisons

1998-11-16 Thread Aaron M. Renn
Can you show one example of a protected class in the documentation? I think that would settle this for good. Paul asserted that there were no protected classes in JavaDoc and concluded based on that that Sun didn't intend for protected classes to be part of the public API. Not an entire class,

Re: better javap comparisons

1998-11-16 Thread Brian Jones
"Aaron M. Renn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you show one example of a protected class in the documentation? I think that would settle this for good. Paul asserted that there were no protected classes in JavaDoc and concluded based on that that Sun didn't intend for protected classes to