Re: [Classpath] Re: bug in gnu.vm.stack.StackFrame

2002-10-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 00:43, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On 10 Sep 2002, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > StackFrame, ExecutionStack and StackTrace are a bit old. I don't know if > > there are VMs that still use these classes. For Throwable stack traces > > we now have java.lang.StackTraceElement an

Re: [Classpath] Re: bug in gnu.vm.stack.StackFrame

2002-09-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On 10 Sep 2002, Mark Wielaard wrote: > StackFrame, ExecutionStack and StackTrace are a bit old. I don't know if > there are VMs that still use these classes. For Throwable stack traces > we now have java.lang.StackTraceElement and I will soon add my recent > work on VMThrowable that I did for lib

Re: bug in gnu.vm.stack.StackFrame

2002-09-10 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 20:59, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > The gnu/vm/stack/StackFrame class has the following bit of code: > > private StackFrame(Object obj, Method method, int lineNum, String filename) { > this.caller = caller; > > } > > Note that 'caller' is not an argument

bug in gnu.vm.stack.StackFrame

2002-09-06 Thread C. Scott Ananian
The gnu/vm/stack/StackFrame class has the following bit of code: private StackFrame(Object obj, Method method, int lineNum, String filename) { this.caller = caller; } Note that 'caller' is not an argument of the constructor. So the first statement of the constructor is effectiv