Hi,
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 19:51, Per Bothner wrote:
If you've created a cvs tag, and given it a real version number,
I'd call it a release, even if it's not a 1.0 relase. alpha.gnu.org
has outlived its usefulness (evidenced by the fact that it is little
used) now that alpha code is available
Classpath and SableVM developers,
I started merging Classpath 0.06 with SableVM. My goal is to
minimize the number of changes required in Classpath and SableVM.
In the next few days / weeks, I will start giving some feedback to the
Classpath team. (I couldn't wait to announce it!)
Most work
Hi,
Does ORP 1.10 work with this new release? After browsing through the
mailing list archives, I cannot find why ORP is broken with the
classpath. I really like to do some experiments on some server
benchmarks like tomcat/jboss and jbb by using ORP+classpath, and I
believe the latest classpath
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 08:07, Qiong Cai wrote:
Does ORP 1.10 work with this new release? After browsing through the
mailing list archives, I cannot find why ORP is broken with the
classpath.
I don't think Orp will work out of the box with the 0.06 snapshot.
But the changes since the last
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Although I don't have access yet to alpha.gnu.org to publish the release
I have already created the 0.06 release tarball. I also tagged the CVS
tree as 'classpath-0_06-release'.
You don't put releases on alpha.gnu.org - you put them on ftp.gnu.org.
You can put pre-releases on
Hi,
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 18:07, Per Bothner wrote:
You don't put releases on alpha.gnu.org - you put them on ftp.gnu.org.
You can put pre-releases on alpha.gnu.org, but if you already have
a release there seems little point.
My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the
Hi,
Although I don't have access yet to alpha.gnu.org to publish the release
I have already created the 0.06 release tarball. I also tagged the CVS
tree as 'classpath-0_06-release'.
Current tarball can be found at:
http://www.klomp.org/mark/classpath/classpath-0.06.tar.gz
It has the following
Mark Wielaard wrote:
My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the pre-releases
while we work towards the first real GNU Classpath 1.0 release. People
can combine these pre-releases with their own VMs like gcj, kissme,
jikesRVM, Jaos, etc already do. But as long as we don't have at
Hi,
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 15:56, David P Grove wrote:
There was some discussion a month or so ago about making a classpath
0.06 distribution. Is there a chance this could happen sometime
relatively soon? We're thinking about making the next release of
Jikes RVM in 2-3 weeks and it would
Hi,
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 19:31, Brian Jones wrote:
I can help to physically get it on the ftp server, etc. if Mark needs
it.
Paul has given me access to the ftp and alpha download areas. But I have
not tried out these new powers yet. Help with packaging and putting
things on the right
Hi,
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 11:56, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Sorry, maybe a idiot question, but is there a release plan for 0.06,
0.07, ..., 1.0?
Good questions. There is no real release plan for 0.0x, 0.0x+1, etc. We
just agreed to make a release roughly every couple of months. The plan
for
There was some discussion a month or
so ago about making a classpath 0.06 distribution. Is there a chance
this could happen sometime relatively soon? We're thinking about
making the next release of Jikes RVM in 2-3 weeks and it would be great
to be able to get all the hard work done in classpath
David P Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was some discussion a month or so ago about making a classpath 0.06
distribution. Is there a chance this could happen sometime relatively
soon? We're thinking about making the next release of Jikes RVM in 2-3
weeks and it would be great
13 matches
Mail list logo
