Re: classpath initialization

2003-10-22 Thread Patrik Reali
In Jaos, the ClassLoader is loaded but not really used (I'm still stuck with classpath 0.5) because I have my own native implementation which overrides the calls to Java's classloader in Class.fromName(). I'm currently upgrading my implementation to work with 0.6 by moving all the native stuff into

Re: classpath initialization

2003-10-21 Thread Chris Gray
gt; a java program. > > This remarks (in particular 2 and 3) are quite Jaos specific. > > This won't probably solve your problem, but may give you some insight about > the various problems encountered during the initialization phase. > > -Patrik > > Patr

Re: classpath initialization

2003-10-20 Thread Patrik Reali
al Message - From: "Joseph Wenninger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:33 PM Subject: classpath initialization > Hi > > I'm trying to use an unmodified classpath (0.06). I already have > something working with a m

RE: classpath initialization

2003-10-14 Thread David Holmes
Joseph, > My problem is that the call stack during initialization of > the System class I looks something like ... > The last line causes an exception, since the static member > properties isn't initialized yet. Initialization is quite tricky. Basically your VMClassloader is making assumptions ab

classpath initialization

2003-10-14 Thread Joseph Wenninger
Hi I'm trying to use an unmodified classpath (0.06). I already have something working with a modified one. My problem is that the call stack during initialization of the System class I looks something like LOG: called: java/lang/System.()V() LOG: called: java/lang/System.loadLibrary(Ljava/la