Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

[Sorry for the duplicate message, trouble with my primary email account] Hi, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:52 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Thanks. This seems to point out two things: > > 1) There is a huge allocation (2MB+): > >at this point in the code: > > // REVIEW: Using max instead

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi, On 12/5/05, Robert Lougher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2) JamVM has fragmented its heap so much that it cannot allocate such a > > block of data even though there is enough space in total: > >>943718392 (82%)> > > > >

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi Robert, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:10 +, Robert Lougher wrote: > On second thoughts, it may have been rejected by gmail if the > attachment was too big (how big was it?). Could you try compressing > it (if it wasn't)? It is in the gmane archives here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jav

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

On 12/5/05, Robert Lougher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Fred, > > > > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? > > > > > > > Attached. > >

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi, On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Fred, > > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? > > > > > Attached. > > Thanks. This seems to point out two things: > > 1) There is a huge all

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi Rob, > > Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? > Attached. I ran this from the Makefile in .../classpath-0.19/doc/api/Makefile defining the symbol GJDOC in the Makefile as GJDOC= gjdoc -J-Xms200m -J-Xmx900m -verbose:gc then do gmake html I also had to fiddle wit

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi Fred, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? > > > Attached. Thanks. This seems to point out two things: 1) There is a huge allocation (2MB+): at this point in the code: // REVIEW: Using max

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi, On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frederick, > > On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 21:26 -0500, Frederick C Druseikis wrote: > > I'm using gjdoc-0.7.6 to test a new port of JamVM-1.4.1 + > > classpath-0.19 on OpenBSD. I'm trying to get gjdoc to do all the > > classpath documentati

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi Frederick, On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 21:26 -0500, Frederick C Druseikis wrote: > I'm using gjdoc-0.7.6 to test a new port of JamVM-1.4.1 + > classpath-0.19 on OpenBSD. I'm trying to get gjdoc to do all the > classpath documentation. gjdoc makes a lot of progress (it's > outputting stuff), but blo

memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Greetings, I'm using gjdoc-0.7.6 to test a new port of JamVM-1.4.1 + classpath-0.19 on OpenBSD. I'm trying to get gjdoc to do all the classpath documentation. gjdoc makes a lot of progress (it's outputting stuff), but blows off by hitting an upper memory limit. My question is this: Should I exp