On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:18:12PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
> Hi,
> Why did Classpath ever go with that esoteric linking exception
> instead of simple LGPL?
>
> I can think of several reasons, but "I wanna know God's thoughts, the
> rest are details"...just kidding :-)
Because the LGP
Philippe Laporte wrote:
Hi,
Why did Classpath ever go with that esoteric linking exception
instead of simple LGPL?
I can think of several reasons, but "I wanna know God's thoughts, the
rest are details"...just kidding :-)
IIRC many FSF runtime libraries have this exception.
My interpr
Hi,
Why did Classpath ever go with that esoteric linking exception
instead of simple LGPL?
I can think of several reasons, but "I wanna know God's thoughts, the
rest are details"...just kidding :-)
Best Regards,
--
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:18 +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
> Why did Classpath ever go with that esoteric linking exception
> instead of simple LGPL?
To enable static linking with proprietary software without the LGPL's
re-link requirement.
AG
4 matches
Mail list logo