This is a partial implementation of HTMLDocument.HTMLReader. I am still
working on this, so it will be more fully implemented soon.
I submit this as RFC because it has several methods that have nothing
more than "FIXME: Implement" as well as some debugging statements.
These are there so that Lill
> "Gary" == Gary Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> At the moment Security.setProperty() will not allow the setting of
Gary> null property values. Since Security.getProperty() returns null for
Gary> unset properties this means that the following will fail:
When you sent this last week
These classes implement a JAXP SAX parser on top of the new StAX
implementation.
2005-12-12 Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnu/xml/stream/SAXParser.java,
gnu/xml/stream/SAXParserFactory.java,
gnu/xml/stream/XMLParser.java: SAX parser using StAX
implementation.
Hiyo,
Am 12.12.2005 schrieb "David Daney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Roman Kennke wrote:
>> I committed the attached patch that checks the correctness of various
>> aspects of the JComponent.getPreferredSize() method.
>>
>> 2005-12-12 Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * gnu/testlet/jav
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > The attached patch provides a new StAX XML parser, mostly feature
> > complete but currently without support for DTD validation.
> >
> > 2005-12-12 Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >* gnu/xml/stream/XMLInputFactoryImpl.java,
> > gnu/xml/stream/CRLFReade
Roman Kennke wrote:
I committed the attached patch that checks the correctness of various
aspects of the JComponent.getPreferredSize() method.
2005-12-12 Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnu/testlet/javax/swing/JComponent/getPreferredSize.java:
New test.
/Roman
But this i
Hi Chris,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 11:35 +, Chris Burdess wrote:
> The attached patch provides a new StAX XML parser, mostly feature
> complete but currently without support for DTD validation.
>
> 2005-12-12 Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>* gnu/xml/stream/XMLInputFactoryImpl.java,
Hi,
At the moment Security.setProperty() will not allow the setting of
null property values. Since Security.getProperty() returns null for
unset properties this means that the following will fail:
String key = "some.old.property";
Security.setProperty(key, Security.getProperty(key));
The ja
Hi all,
I committed the attached patch which makes the new JComponent Mauve test
pass.
2005-12-12 Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* javax/swing/JComponent.java
(getPreferredSize): Don't check for the minimumSize. According to
a mauve test, this is not necessary.
/Roma
This patch makes the new ViewportLayout.layoutContainer Mauve test pass.
2005-12-12 Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* javax/swing/ViewportLayout.java
(layoutContainer): Always check and adjust the size, not only when
portSize >= view.minSize.
/Roman
Index: javax/swing/
I committed the attached patch that checks the correctness of various
aspects of the JComponent.getPreferredSize() method.
2005-12-12 Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnu/testlet/javax/swing/JComponent/getPreferredSize.java:
New test.
/Roman
// Tags: JDK1.2
// Copyright (C)
Hi.
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> I dunno, this seems pretty clean if it works:
>
> public class Throw {
> private static Throwable t;
> public Throw() throws Throwable {throw t;}
> public static synchronized void uncheckedThrow(Throwable t) {
> Throw.t = t;
> try {
> Throw.class.ne
Hi Stuart,
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:42 -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Throw.uncheckedThrow(new InvalidClassException("..."));
>
> A perfectly portable illegal-exception-thrower :)
It is a nice hack. But I agree with Guilhem that "illegally" throwing
checked exceptions from methods which are not
Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > Jeroen pointed out to me a while back that you can use
> generics to throw an
> > unchecked exception:
>
> There's also a way to do this without using JDK 1.5 stuff, but it's
> even uglier :-)
>
> Construct a class (dynamically) that has a default
On 12/11/05, Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bah ! I would rather use a native function that will throw directly
> InvalidClassException. The problem is that's will be anyway hidden to
> the general user and that he/she may be surprised getting that sort of
> exception.
I dunno, this s
15 matches
Mail list logo
