Il giorno gio, 08/11/2007 alle 16.44 +0100, Robert Schuster ha scritto:
> Hi.
> > Can you try using statfs? If it's a system where df is available we can
> > try to steal some code from there also.
> This is Debian Lenny/Sid x86. I am not sure whether it is normal that
> statvfs is not available o
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:44 +0100, Robert Schuster wrote:
> Now if HAVE_STATVFS is not defined the compiler is correct mourning that
> 'path' and 'type' are not used. I have seen code (in classpath) where
> this issue is solved this way:
>
> JNIEXPORT long long
> cpio_df (const char *path, CPFILE_
Hi.
Mario Torre schrieb:
> Il giorno gio, 08/11/2007 alle 13.06 +0100, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:13 +0100, Robert Schuster wrote:
>>> this patch marks the parameters of cpio_df as possibly unused and
>>> silents the warning/lets the build continue with
Hi,
Committed.
Regards,
Jeroen
2007-11-08 Jeroen Frijters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* java/util/Locale.java
(Locale): Always intern strings.
Index: Locale.java
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/java/util/Lo
On 08/11/2007, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 07:23 +0100, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > It looks like this is caused by the fact that the Locale constructor
> > doesn't intern the strings passed in when it is constructing the
> > default Locale. I'm a bit surprised
Il giorno gio, 08/11/2007 alle 13.06 +0100, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:13 +0100, Robert Schuster wrote:
> > this patch marks the parameters of cpio_df as possibly unused and
> > silents the warning/lets the build continue with -Wall.
>
> Which system is t
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 07:23 +0100, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> It looks like this is caused by the fact that the Locale constructor
> doesn't intern the strings passed in when it is constructing the
> default Locale. I'm a bit surprised that this hasn't been caught
> earlier though, so I'm wondering i
Hi Robert,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:13 +0100, Robert Schuster wrote:
> this patch marks the parameters of cpio_df as possibly unused and
> silents the warning/lets the build continue with -Wall.
Which system is this?
I am not really opposed to the patch, but it would of course be better
to figure