- Original Message -
> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:54 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> > > > If you really meant gjdoc I think it would be OK to try to
> > > > accept it,
> > > > but m
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:54 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> > > If you really meant gjdoc I think it would be OK to try to accept it,
> > > but maybe with a warning message that it is untested?
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> > If you really meant gjdoc I think it would be OK to try to accept it,
> > but maybe with a warning message that it is untested?
>
> yes, I meant gjdoc. Here is an updated patch.
>
> Matthi
Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out for any
>> other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too?
>
> I think that should be fine for gja
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out
> > for any
> > other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too?
>
> I think that should be fine for gjavah, I
- Original Message -
> Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out
> for any
> other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too?
>
> Matthias
>
>
Does source even matter to gjavah? What do higher versions require?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Soft
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out for any
> other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too?
I think that should be fine for gjavah, I cannot think of something
in the bytecode tha
Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out for any
other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too?
Matthias
Index: classpath/tools/gnu/classpath/tools/gjdoc/Main.java
===
--- classpath/to