Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2013-01-10 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:54 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard: > > > > If you really meant gjdoc I think it would be OK to try to > > > > accept it, > > > > but m

Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2013-01-10 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:54 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard: > > > If you really meant gjdoc I think it would be OK to try to accept it, > > > but maybe with a warning message that it is untested?

Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2013-01-07 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard: > > If you really meant gjdoc I think it would be OK to try to accept it, > > but maybe with a warning message that it is untested? > > yes, I meant gjdoc. Here is an updated patch. > > Matthi

Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2013-01-06 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out for any >> other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too? > > I think that should be fine for gja

Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2012-12-20 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out > > for any > > other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too? > > I think that should be fine for gjavah, I

Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2012-12-19 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out > for any > other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too? > > Matthias > > Does source even matter to gjavah? What do higher versions require? -- Andrew :) Free Java Soft

Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2012-12-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out for any > other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too? I think that should be fine for gjavah, I cannot think of something in the bytecode tha

[cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]

2012-12-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Currently gjavah only accepts -source 1.4 and lower, and errors out for any other value. Would it be reasonable to accept higher versions too? Matthias Index: classpath/tools/gnu/classpath/tools/gjdoc/Main.java === --- classpath/to