On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 11:31 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 22:16 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
That seems like an significant improvement. Could you test with a larger
dataset (or just run the test in a loop 10 times)? I still haven't tried
with gcj. If someone could
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:00 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:28 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
position. Opinions? Volunteers? Anyone want to test against other
runtimes? Or another test set?
Hmm, just tested the patch with cacao. It finished in 1.48user with and
Hi Anthony,
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 22:18 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 14:53 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 12:49 -0700, David Daney wrote:
You also might want to look at comment #1 of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
I suspect that Vector usage is from the time when Vector was the only storage
class we had available. AFAIK ArrayList (which is IMHO Vector without locking)
and friends have been introduced with 1.2
Could you find out where Vector is used
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 12:24 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
Synchronization often shows up near the very top of gcj-compiled
benchmarks. It turns out that, for benchmarks I've run, ~50% of the
synchronization calls come from reading property files with
StringBuffer. This should all go away if we
Anthony == Anthony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony I patched the FC rawhide GCC to use gnu.gcj.runtime.StringBuffer in
Anthony java.util.Properties, and wrote a little program to read the locale
Anthony property files from GNU Classpath. Reading the property files was
Anthony about 10%
Synchronization often shows up near the very top of gcj-compiled
benchmarks. It turns out that, for benchmarks I've run, ~50% of the
synchronization calls come from reading property files with
StringBuffer. This should all go away if we use StringBuilder instead.
Ok?
2005-10-19 Anthony Green
