Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > I would like to apply the attached patch. It fixes a potential
> > initialization order issue for VMs that support running Java code
> > without first initializing the VM explicitly (like IKVM does).
>
> Dumb questions: why don't you initialize the
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
I would like to apply the attached patch. It fixes a potential
initialization order issue for VMs that support running Java code
without first initializing the VM explicitly (like IKVM does).
Dumb questions: why don't you initialize the VM in JNI_CreateJavaVM()?
What is g
Hi,
I would like to apply the attached patch. It fixes a potential
initialization order issue for VMs that support running Java code
without first initializing the VM explicitly (like IKVM does).
The current code calls ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader() in the Thread
constructor that the VM uses