Hello to All,
We are getting ready to deploy two 3310s for virtual call center users. The
users are home based Customer Service Reps who VPN into us and are allowed
access to the network. Currently we have written agreements with Reps that they
have Windows Update enabled and use an AntiVirus
print!
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:cleanacc...@listserv.muohio.edu] On Behalf Of Pete Boynton
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:20 AM
To: CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
Subject: NAC Noob
Hello to All,
We are getting ready to deploy two 3310s for virtual call
?
Michael Stanclift
Network Analyst
Rockhurst University
http://help.rockhurst.eduhttp://help.rockhurst.edu/
(816) 501-4231
PThink before you print!
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:cleanacc...@listserv.muohio.edu] On Behalf Of Pete Boynton
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:20
Thanks for the input Tom. These are 3310s from Cisco. I assume I am good with
these for some years of support and upgrades no?
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:cleanacc...@listserv.muohio.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Stachowiak
Sent: Wednesday,
Hello,
I am trying to deploy a in-band solution for VPN users. There have been a few
surprises after having started this project.
1. Because users are coming in over a VPN the topology must be in-band.
2. If you want to have redundant CAS servers they cannot be separated by
a NAT
Of Mike Diggins
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:34 AM
To: CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
Subject: Re: AntiVirus Enforcement
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Pete Boynton wrote:
Hello,
I am getting ready to deploy a CAS in-band for VPN users coming into our
network. I had a few questions about antivirus
How about disconnecting the CAS and connecting again:
CCA Servers - List of Servers- Disconnect
And then CCA Servers - List of Servers- Manage
But I am not too sure.
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:cleanacc...@listserv.muohio.edu] On
the AnyConnect client in the taskbar ;))
--Jeremy
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:15, Pete Boynton pboyn...@higherone.com wrote:
Anyone ever seen this error message??
Failed to Launch the Cisco NAC Agent Downloader! Please download the agent
zip file and install it manually. (status = 1601)
One
Hello!
We are rolling out an In-Band virtual gateway for our VPN users and I have come
across something I can't confirm. All my Windows Vista Home Premium x64 users
are failing the check for SP2. I don't have any x64 machines to check to see
where Service Pack 2 is in the registry. Can anyone
Subject: Re: Advice on deployment needed
Pete Boynton wrote:
Is there a reason you want to go OOB...???
Right now I guess we want to do that because of scaling. We are a
fast growing company and by keeping the traffic out of band we won't
overwhelm the CAM.
For what it's worth we have run
...@listserv.muohio.edu] On Behalf Of Pete Boynton
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:20 PM
To: CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
Subject: Re: Announcing NAC Release 4.7.1 availability!!
Josh,
Does that mean we need to do a fresh install on the CAS and CAM if they are
running 4.6.1? And if so, I assume
Just did the upgrade to 4.7.1 and my CPU is being pegged by kclick now:
top - 11:46:18 up 43 min, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 0.91
Tasks: 72 total, 3 running, 69 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.3%us, 59.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 40.7%si, 0.0%st
Mem:
Hello,
Has anyone seen this before?
I have a user who is running Vista Home Premium but NAC sees it as an XP
machine and is enforcing the SP3 requirement we have in place for XP.
of luck using just
NAC. You could write a powershell script + scheduled task to move the
user between groups in AD and then use NAC to map via those groups.
--Jeremy
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 16:12, Pete Boynton pboyn...@higherone.com wrote:
Has anyone ever done this?:
I have a user who
Hello,
Has anyone out there used the integration available between Cisco NAC and
LanDesk? We are looking to possibly roll out LanDesk, and if it can help us get
more bang for our buck.
Thanks,
Pete
This is from TAC:
The NAC currently supports Security Essentials version 1.x starting NAC
version 4.7.1. Security Essentials version 2.0 is currently not supported, and
the development team said that it would not be available until at least the
second quarter of 2011 for 4.7.x. It might be
Dan,
You mentioned OPSWAT. I am deploying a 4.9.1 installation for AnConnect
clients. Is OPSWAT ready to go out of the box? Or is there some configuration
needed to get it working?
Thanks
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU] On Behalf Of
We are running the 4.9.1.6 agent and just changed users to use a 4.9.1 server
and they are complaining it is much slower that the older server that was
running 4.7.2
Not too sure what we can do
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
that might be.
Dan
**
Daniel Albaugh
Manager of Network Services
Univ. of TN Health Science Center
877 Madison Ave, Room 770
Memphis, TN 38163
**
On Aug 23, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Pete Boynton wrote:
We are running
19 matches
Mail list logo
