Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2014-06-13 Thread William Harrington
On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: I've made a few updates to the embedded book. Pull request info below. I've not build-tested these changes but it's unlikely to have broken things worse than they were before (such as, the musl symlink issue may still be present). I'll do so

[Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2014-06-13 Thread Andrew Bradford
I've made a few updates to the embedded book. Pull request info below. I've not build-tested these changes but it's unlikely to have broken things worse than they were before (such as, the musl symlink issue may still be present). I'll do some testing real soon now. Thanks! -Andrew The followi

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-11-11 Thread Andrew Bradford
On 11/10/13 14:30, Rob Landley wrote: > On 11/05/2013 07:45:44 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: >> Dear Rob, >> >> On 11/05/13 07:35, Rob Landley wrote: >> > On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: >> >> Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out >> >> yesterday and tod

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-11-10 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/05/2013 07:45:44 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: Dear Rob, On 11/05/13 07:35, Rob Landley wrote: > On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: >> Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out >> yesterday and today. >> >> The biggest change that might piss off the bu

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-11-05 Thread Andrew Bradford
Dear Rob, On 11/05/13 07:35, Rob Landley wrote: > On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: >> Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out >> yesterday and today. >> >> The biggest change that might piss off the build tools is the removal of >> the version number fr

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-11-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out yesterday and today. The biggest change that might piss off the build tools is the removal of the version number from the book. We're not going to do a 1.0 release for embedd

[Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-10-17 Thread Andrew Bradford
Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out yesterday and today. The biggest change that might piss off the build tools is the removal of the version number from the book. We're not going to do a 1.0 release for embedded, let's just use the date code as that's easy to sear

[Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-10-16 Thread Andrew Bradford
Good bye uClibc, hello musl-libc! Plus lots of other fixes including a real sysroot that's completely separate from the target file system. Boot tested arm with hard float vfpv3-d16 on a beaglebone. Have not yet fully tested mips or i386 but testers are welcome. Thanks! -Andrew The following

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2013-10-08 Thread William Harrington
On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: The following changes since commit 08270e93ee0f96c35033cb1559d7e37b97993e7a: Add missing hyphen from Bash 4.0 version. Needs to be Bash-4.0. Noticed when updating jhalfs. (2013-09-19 12:22:22 -0500) are available in the git repository

[Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2013-10-08 Thread Andrew Bradford
ARM OABI is obsolete as of GCC 4.7, so let's remove it. Thanks, Andrew The following changes since commit 08270e93ee0f96c35033cb1559d7e37b97993e7a: Add missing hyphen from Bash 4.0 version. Needs to be Bash-4.0. Noticed when updating jhalfs. (2013-09-19 12:22:22 -0500) are available in the

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request

2013-08-13 Thread William Harrington
On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:47 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded forget-headermove for you to fetch changes up to bb8700306140d0ec2767e0708cf92b056785233e: Done, Sincerely, William Harrington___ Clfs-dev mailing list

[Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request

2013-08-12 Thread Andrew Bradford
This fixes what I broke by trying to move all the headers to ${CLFS}/cross-tools. I'm sure it's possible to do but getting GCC and uClibc to do the right things seemed much harder than I expected. Since the book simply has final steps before copying to target of deleting the header directories fr

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-31 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/29/2013 12:27:13 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: I rolled back to an older version of uClibc due to our configs patch leaving a lot of questions for the user when doing a 'make oldconfig' on the newest uClibc release. I'm working on migrating to the newest uClibc, but in stages rather than a

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-29 Thread Andrew Bradford
Rob, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > On 07/24/2013 01:44:35 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > OK, well, don't pull this, yet. I forgot to change the patch names to > > account for the roll back in uClibc version. > > > > I'll fix that and resend. > > I note that my aborigina

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-26 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/24/2013 01:44:35 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: OK, well, don't pull this, yet. I forgot to change the patch names to account for the roll back in uClibc version. I'll fix that and resend. Thanks, Andrew I note that my aboriginal linux project is using the last (ever?) release of uClibc j

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-24 Thread William Harrington
On Jul 24, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: OK, fixed the uClibc patch name. Pushed now. Sincerely, William Harrington___ Clfs-dev mailing list Clfs-dev@lists.cross-lfs.org http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-24 Thread Andrew Bradford
OK, fixed the uClibc patch name. Thanks, Andrew The following changes since commit d1e82c57f264351199d6624b93c4c2c901fd85f5: general: Update date (2013-07-03 16:34:18 -0400) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git somecleaning-v2 for you to fetch

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-24 Thread Andrew Bradford
OK, well, don't pull this, yet. I forgot to change the patch names to account for the roll back in uClibc version. I'll fix that and resend. Thanks, Andrew On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 02:41 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > The following changes since commit > d1e82c57f264351199d6624b93c4c2c901fd85f5: >

[Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-24 Thread Andrew Bradford
The following changes since commit d1e82c57f264351199d6624b93c4c2c901fd85f5: general: Update date (2013-07-03 16:34:18 -0400) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git somecleaning for you to fetch changes up to 26e93646ae6641b88eadb6731bce18e83c1e1

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-03 Thread William Harrington
On Jul 3, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: The following changes since commit 97afd0143096354cac4a8f17360f83f6c6244fae: general: Update date (2013-06-17 16:50:52 -0400) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git testnfix for you to fetch ch

[Clfs-dev] Embedded Pull Request

2013-07-03 Thread Andrew Bradford
The following changes since commit 97afd0143096354cac4a8f17360f83f6c6244fae: general: Update date (2013-06-17 16:50:52 -0400) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git testnfix for you to fetch changes up to d1e82c57f264351199d6624b93c4c2c901fd85f5:

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Spring Cleaning

2013-06-18 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 05:48 PM, William Harrington wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > > It's almost summer time so I wanted to get some spring cleaning > > done :) > > See pull request below. Lots of little cleanups. > > > > After merging, we can close ticket

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Spring Cleaning

2013-06-17 Thread William Harrington
On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: It's almost summer time so I wanted to get some spring cleaning done :) See pull request below. Lots of little cleanups. After merging, we can close ticket #914, #920, and #922. Sorry if my mail line wraps badly, using web interface right

[Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Spring Cleaning

2013-06-17 Thread Andrew Bradford
It's almost summer time so I wanted to get some spring cleaning done :) See pull request below. Lots of little cleanups. After merging, we can close ticket #914, #920, and #922. Sorry if my mail line wraps badly, using web interface right now :( Thanks! -Andrew The following changes since comm

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Removal of WRT arch

2013-06-14 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 10:12 PM, William Harrington wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > > I'm not interested in maintaining WRT for the embedded book. I am > > interested in x86 and ARM, and to a slightly lesser extent MIPS. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > You al

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Removal of WRT arch

2013-06-13 Thread William Harrington
On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: I'm not interested in maintaining WRT for the embedded book. I am interested in x86 and ARM, and to a slightly lesser extent MIPS. Thanks, Andrew You also should contact Justin and get access to the repos. He'll need a pubkey from you for

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Removal of WRT arch

2013-06-13 Thread William Harrington
On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: I'm not interested in maintaining WRT for the embedded book. I am interested in x86 and ARM, and to a slightly lesser extent MIPS. I spit on WRT! Okay I will get this done. Sincerely, WIlliam Harrington___

[Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Removal of WRT arch

2013-06-13 Thread Andrew Bradford
If it's felt that removal of WRT from the embedded book is a good idea[1], please can someone with commit access pull my changes shown below? It might be wise to give my initial ask thread a few more days to accumulate comments before pulling this. [1]:http://lists.cross-lfs.org/pipermail/clfs-de

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Lots of upgrades

2013-06-13 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 01:09 PM, William Harrington wrote: > > On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > > github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git > > we ened updated uClibc configure patch and any other updated patches > to put on the server. Yes. I'm working on that. The exist

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Lots of upgrades

2013-06-13 Thread William Harrington
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git we ened updated uClibc configure patch and any other updated patches to put on the server. Sincerely, WIlliam Harrington___ Clfs-dev mailing list Clfs-dev@l

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Lots of upgrades

2013-06-11 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 10:43 AM, William Harrington wrote: > > On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > > Could someone with commit access please pull a bunch of changes I've > > made to the Embedded book? Pull request info below. > > > > This does not include my removal of the

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Lots of upgrades

2013-06-11 Thread William Harrington
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: Could someone with commit access please pull a bunch of changes I've made to the Embedded book? Pull request info below. This does not include my removal of the bootloaders, kernel build, or removal of WRT. I will send separate pull request

[Clfs-dev] Embedded - Pull Request - Lots of upgrades

2013-06-11 Thread Andrew Bradford
Could someone with commit access please pull a bunch of changes I've made to the Embedded book? Pull request info below. This does not include my removal of the bootloaders, kernel build, or removal of WRT. I will send separate pull requests for those things after I let my messages to the list r

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2012-09-23 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012, at 09:13 PM, William Harrington wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2012, at 14:02 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > > If someone with commit privs on the embedded book could pull from me, > > I'd appreciate it! > > > > Some small fixes to the beginning of the book, nothing technical, just >

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2012-09-22 Thread William Harrington
On Sep 22, 2012, at 14:02 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote: If someone with commit privs on the embedded book could pull from me, I'd appreciate it! Some small fixes to the beginning of the book, nothing technical, just prose type changes. Thanks, Andrew The following changes since commit e2ce5d5b96

[Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2012-09-22 Thread Andrew Bradford
If someone with commit privs on the embedded book could pull from me, I'd appreciate it! Some small fixes to the beginning of the book, nothing technical, just prose type changes. Thanks, Andrew The following changes since commit e2ce5d5b9693be79d12734d4226180ae0e831b54: Update date (2012-09-1

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2012-09-19 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 16:02:54 William Harrington wrote: > On Sep 18, 2012, at 07:48 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > git://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git simpler-arm > > Done, Justin was working on getting you privs. Have you any, yet? Thanks! Justin got me all squared away with my

Re: [Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2012-09-18 Thread William Harrington
On Sep 18, 2012, at 07:48 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: git://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git simpler-arm Done, Justin was working on getting you privs. Have you any, yet? Sincerely, William Harrington ___ Clfs-dev mailing list Clfs-dev@lists.c

[Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2012-09-18 Thread Andrew Bradford
Can someone with commit priv on clfs-embedded please review and pull (see below) from my github? I've added some recommendations to the ARM ABI and build vars selecting pages. Most people build for ARM9 or Cortex-A{8,9} boards so make selecting for those less confusing. Thanks, Andrew The

[Clfs-dev] Embedded pull request

2012-09-13 Thread Andrew Bradford
Could someone with commit privs on the embedded book please pull these changes in for me? Once pulled, we can close trac ticket 867. Thanks! -Andrew The following changes since commit 1a6ffe8cb221dadd47c8ecf452c6a9e2d95ec1c1: Remove extra cruft at the end of ucblibc-version-configs-2.patch m

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-06-12 Thread Andrew Bradford
This thread is a bit of an oldy (and the subject no longer matches the content) but thought I'd bring it back up as I'm looking to add xinetd to beyond for the embedded book (Ivan sent me some info on all the steps quite a while ago but I've been busy with a bunch of other things recently) and I wa

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-05-14 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote: >> I'd also like to have something that defines what the dependencies are >> for packages. > Take a look at the appendices/dependencies/{common,arm,mips,x86}.xml > files. This information should still be correct. That information used > to be inc

[Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-05-14 Thread Andrew Bradford
A small set of updates that are ready to be pulled into the mainline embedded book. Pull request below. If merged, these should close trac ticket 833 (http://trac.cross-lfs.org/ticket/833). Thanks, Andrew The following changes since commit 6d3ef5a4e4cf70408fc5c3f6f30d921573c1e28d: Move zlib

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-21 Thread sjs205
On 04/21/2011 01:16 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote: But let me ask, in the future some of those sections are going to get big. Both CBLFS and BLFS have the files needed for each package listed on each page rather then in a manifest at the top of th

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-20 Thread Joe Ciccone
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 20:16 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote: > > But let me ask, in the future some of those sections are going to get > > big. Both CBLFS and BLFS have the files needed for each package listed > > on each page rather then in a ma

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-20 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote: > But let me ask, in the future some of those sections are going to get > big. Both CBLFS and BLFS have the files needed for each package listed > on each page rather then in a manifest at the top of the section. Lets > say a section was to have

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-20 Thread Joe Ciccone
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 08:07 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote: > I've got another set of changes for the embedded book that are ready > for review. Pull request is below. > > Included in here are some fix-ups along with a bit of a major change > to change the Beyond section into a few chapters. Curr

[Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-19 Thread Andrew Bradford
I've got another set of changes for the embedded book that are ready for review. Pull request is below. Included in here are some fix-ups along with a bit of a major change to change the Beyond section into a few chapters. Currently I've got an intro, networking, and file system chapter. E2fspr

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-12 Thread Joe Ciccone
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 07:40 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote: > > Looks good to me, merged in. > > Sorry, but in the last set of changes you pulled from me, there was a > patch called gcc-4.6.0-uclibc-arm-softfloat-1.patch. > It doesn't apply clea

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-12 Thread Andrew Bradford
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote: > Looks good to me, merged in. Sorry, but in the last set of changes you pulled from me, there was a patch called gcc-4.6.0-uclibc-arm-softfloat-1.patch. It doesn't apply cleanly to GCC-4.6.0. I don't think there was enough context for the patch

Re: [Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-08 Thread Joe Ciccone
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 07:56 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote: > Joe / other maintainers, > > I've got another set of changes for the embedded book. When you get a > chance, could you please check them over and, if they look good, pull > them into the mainline embedded repo? > > If there's any conce

[Clfs-dev] [Embedded] Pull Request

2011-04-08 Thread Andrew Bradford
Joe / other maintainers, I've got another set of changes for the embedded book.  When you get a chance, could you please check them over and, if they look good, pull them into the mainline embedded repo? If there's any concerns, please let me know. Thanks, Andrew The following changes since co