Re: [Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-05 Thread Martin Ward
On 05/04/14 14:35, William Harrington wrote: On Apr 5, 2014, at 1:36 AM, Martin Ward wrote: rebuilt the system again, still can't see how ar links to flex whether dynamically or statically, nothing in the toolchain requires bison or flex, built up to final system gcc with no errors If flex

Re: [Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-05 Thread William Harrington
On Apr 5, 2014, at 1:36 AM, Martin Ward wrote: rebuilt the system again, still can't see how ar links to flex whether dynamically or statically, nothing in the toolchain requires bison or flex, built up to final system gcc with no errors If flex is available, ar links to it (not required,

Re: [Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-04 Thread Martin Ward
On 05/04/14 06:27, William Harrington wrote: On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Martin Ward wrote: I couldn't find a way of letting binutils build without finding flex and bison other than renaming the binaries. I've just finished the cross compile stage with flex and bison removed from the cross

Re: [Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-04 Thread William Harrington
On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Martin Ward wrote: I couldn't find a way of letting binutils build without finding flex and bison other than renaming the binaries. I've just finished the cross compile stage with flex and bison removed from the cross compile stage, so far so good. Obviously

Re: [Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-04 Thread William Harrington
On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Martin Ward wrote: If we build with flex 2.5.38(9) as in the book, quite a few binutil tests fail, although all the programs and libraries build ok I couldn't find a way of letting binutils build without finding flex and bison other than renaming the binaries. I

Re: [Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-04 Thread Martin Ward
On 04/04/14 01:16, William Harrington wrote: On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Martin Ward wrote: Hi I notice that bison and flex have been moved before binutils in both the cross-compile and final system stages, unless i'm missing something completely obvious, release tarballs don't need these

Re: [Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-03 Thread William Harrington
On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Martin Ward wrote: Hi I notice that bison and flex have been moved before binutils in both the cross-compile and final system stages, unless i'm missing something completely obvious, release tarballs don't need these programs and never have done. I can't find

[Clfs-dev] Latest git build Pure 64 systemd bison and flex

2014-04-03 Thread Martin Ward
Hi I notice that bison and flex have been moved before binutils in both the cross-compile and final system stages, unless i'm missing something completely obvious, release tarballs don't need these programs and never have done. I can't find anything about ar linking to the flex library anywhe