On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
I've made a few updates to the embedded book.
Pull request info below.
I've not build-tested these changes but it's unlikely to have
broken things worse than they were before (such as, the musl
symlink issue may still be present). I'll do so
On 11/10/13 14:30, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 11/05/2013 07:45:44 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>> Dear Rob,
>>
>> On 11/05/13 07:35, Rob Landley wrote:
>> > On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>> >> Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out
>> >> yesterday and tod
On 11/05/2013 07:45:44 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
Dear Rob,
On 11/05/13 07:35, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>> Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out
>> yesterday and today.
>>
>> The biggest change that might piss off the bu
Dear Rob,
On 11/05/13 07:35, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>> Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out
>> yesterday and today.
>>
>> The biggest change that might piss off the build tools is the removal of
>> the version number fr
On 10/17/2013 03:19:16 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
Lots of cleaning up, few little fixes for errors others pointed out
yesterday and today.
The biggest change that might piss off the build tools is the removal
of
the version number from the book. We're not going to do a 1.0 release
for embedd
On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
The following changes since commit
08270e93ee0f96c35033cb1559d7e37b97993e7a:
Add missing hyphen from Bash 4.0 version. Needs to be Bash-4.0.
Noticed when updating jhalfs. (2013-09-19 12:22:22 -0500)
are available in the git repository
On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:47 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded forget-headermove
for you to fetch changes up to
bb8700306140d0ec2767e0708cf92b056785233e:
Done,
Sincerely,
William Harrington___
Clfs-dev mailing list
On 07/29/2013 12:27:13 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
I rolled back to an older version of uClibc due to our configs patch
leaving a lot of questions for the user when doing a 'make oldconfig'
on
the newest uClibc release. I'm working on migrating to the newest
uClibc, but in stages rather than a
Rob,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 01:44:35 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> > OK, well, don't pull this, yet. I forgot to change the patch names to
> > account for the roll back in uClibc version.
> >
> > I'll fix that and resend.
>
> I note that my aborigina
On 07/24/2013 01:44:35 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
OK, well, don't pull this, yet. I forgot to change the patch names to
account for the roll back in uClibc version.
I'll fix that and resend.
Thanks,
Andrew
I note that my aboriginal linux project is using the last (ever?)
release of uClibc j
On Jul 24, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
OK, fixed the uClibc patch name.
Pushed now.
Sincerely,
William Harrington___
Clfs-dev mailing list
Clfs-dev@lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
OK, fixed the uClibc patch name.
Thanks,
Andrew
The following changes since commit
d1e82c57f264351199d6624b93c4c2c901fd85f5:
general: Update date (2013-07-03 16:34:18 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git somecleaning-v2
for you to fetch
OK, well, don't pull this, yet. I forgot to change the patch names to
account for the roll back in uClibc version.
I'll fix that and resend.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 02:41 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> The following changes since commit
> d1e82c57f264351199d6624b93c4c2c901fd85f5:
>
On Jul 3, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
The following changes since commit
97afd0143096354cac4a8f17360f83f6c6244fae:
general: Update date (2013-06-17 16:50:52 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git testnfix
for you to fetch ch
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 05:48 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>
> > It's almost summer time so I wanted to get some spring cleaning
> > done :)
> > See pull request below. Lots of little cleanups.
> >
> > After merging, we can close ticket
On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
It's almost summer time so I wanted to get some spring cleaning
done :)
See pull request below. Lots of little cleanups.
After merging, we can close ticket #914, #920, and #922.
Sorry if my mail line wraps badly, using web interface right
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 10:12 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>
> > I'm not interested in maintaining WRT for the embedded book. I am
> > interested in x86 and ARM, and to a slightly lesser extent MIPS.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
>
> You al
On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
I'm not interested in maintaining WRT for the embedded book. I am
interested in x86 and ARM, and to a slightly lesser extent MIPS.
Thanks,
Andrew
You also should contact Justin and get access to the repos.
He'll need a pubkey from you for
On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
I'm not interested in maintaining WRT for the embedded book. I am
interested in x86 and ARM, and to a slightly lesser extent MIPS.
I spit on WRT! Okay I will get this done.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington___
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 01:09 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>
> > github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git
>
> we ened updated uClibc configure patch and any other updated patches
> to put on the server.
Yes. I'm working on that. The exist
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git
we ened updated uClibc configure patch and any other updated patches
to put on the server.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington___
Clfs-dev mailing list
Clfs-dev@l
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 10:43 AM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>
> > Could someone with commit access please pull a bunch of changes I've
> > made to the Embedded book? Pull request info below.
> >
> > This does not include my removal of the
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
Could someone with commit access please pull a bunch of changes I've
made to the Embedded book? Pull request info below.
This does not include my removal of the bootloaders, kernel build, or
removal of WRT. I will send separate pull request
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012, at 09:13 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2012, at 14:02 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
>
> > If someone with commit privs on the embedded book could pull from me,
> > I'd appreciate it!
> >
> > Some small fixes to the beginning of the book, nothing technical, just
>
On Sep 22, 2012, at 14:02 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
If someone with commit privs on the embedded book could pull from me,
I'd appreciate it!
Some small fixes to the beginning of the book, nothing technical, just
prose type changes.
Thanks,
Andrew
The following changes since commit
e2ce5d5b96
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 16:02:54 William Harrington wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2012, at 07:48 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> > git://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git simpler-arm
>
> Done, Justin was working on getting you privs. Have you any, yet?
Thanks!
Justin got me all squared away with my
On Sep 18, 2012, at 07:48 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
git://github.com/bradfa/clfs-embedded.git simpler-arm
Done, Justin was working on getting you privs. Have you any, yet?
Sincerely,
William Harrington
___
Clfs-dev mailing list
Clfs-dev@lists.c
This thread is a bit of an oldy (and the subject no longer matches the
content) but thought I'd bring it back up as I'm looking to add xinetd
to beyond for the embedded book (Ivan sent me some info on all the
steps quite a while ago but I've been busy with a bunch of other
things recently) and I wa
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
>> I'd also like to have something that defines what the dependencies are
>> for packages.
> Take a look at the appendices/dependencies/{common,arm,mips,x86}.xml
> files. This information should still be correct. That information used
> to be inc
On 04/21/2011 01:16 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
But let me ask, in the future some of those sections are going to get
big. Both CBLFS and BLFS have the files needed for each package listed
on each page rather then in a manifest at the top of th
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 20:16 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> > But let me ask, in the future some of those sections are going to get
> > big. Both CBLFS and BLFS have the files needed for each package listed
> > on each page rather then in a ma
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> But let me ask, in the future some of those sections are going to get
> big. Both CBLFS and BLFS have the files needed for each package listed
> on each page rather then in a manifest at the top of the section. Lets
> say a section was to have
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 08:07 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> I've got another set of changes for the embedded book that are ready
> for review. Pull request is below.
>
> Included in here are some fix-ups along with a bit of a major change
> to change the Beyond section into a few chapters. Curr
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 07:40 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> > Looks good to me, merged in.
>
> Sorry, but in the last set of changes you pulled from me, there was a
> patch called gcc-4.6.0-uclibc-arm-softfloat-1.patch.
> It doesn't apply clea
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> Looks good to me, merged in.
Sorry, but in the last set of changes you pulled from me, there was a
patch called gcc-4.6.0-uclibc-arm-softfloat-1.patch.
It doesn't apply cleanly to GCC-4.6.0. I don't think there was enough
context for the patch
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 07:56 -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> Joe / other maintainers,
>
> I've got another set of changes for the embedded book. When you get a
> chance, could you please check them over and, if they look good, pull
> them into the mainline embedded repo?
>
> If there's any conce
36 matches
Mail list logo
