[Clfs-dev] Matching up CLFS snapshot versions with LFS/BLFS releases

2017-07-19 Thread Kevin Buckley
I just posted the following into the LFS-dev list, adding in a couple email addres that i though would go to the listed author of the CLFS book, but two of the three have bounced so I thought to post here as well. Hi again. been looking to add a Xen environment on top of my LFS/BLFS 8.0 buil

Re: [Clfs-dev] Matching up CLFS snapshot versions with LFS/BLFS releases

2017-07-20 Thread Kevin Buckley
On 21 July 2017 at 01:28, William Harrington wrote: > Well for one LFS != CLFS. We have a different release schedule. Also, can > count the active devs on half a hand. My apologies William, I was aware of your involvment in CLFS (and in *FS in general, come to that) but just went with the three

Re: [Clfs-dev] Matching up CLFS snapshot versions with LFS/BLFS releases

2017-07-23 Thread Kevin Buckley
On 22 July 2017 at 14:30, DJ Lucas wrote: > > Oh, I missed the first message to LFS-DevI have original patch which > should match, or at least be close to 8.0. > > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/LFS-Multilib-20170225.diff Bingo! I was going to ask if you had a NOCHUNKS rendering of "

Re: [Clfs-dev] Matching up CLFS snapshot versions with LFS/BLFS releases

2017-07-30 Thread Kevin Buckley
On 22 July 2017 at 14:30, DJ Lucas wrote: > Oh, I missed the first message to LFS-DevI have original patch which > should match, or at least be close to 8.0. > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/LFS-Multilib-20170225.diff Just to say that that patch applied cleanly to the 8.0 book but lef

Re: [Clfs-dev] Matching up CLFS snapshot versions with LFS/BLFS releases

2017-08-05 Thread Kevin Buckley
On 1 August 2017 at 15:45, William Harrington wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:25:44 +1200 > Kevin Buckley wrote: > >> which appears to suggest an extra GCC build AFTER the MultiLib Glibc > > Depends if you want GCC linked to temp GLIBC or not. Your choice. Frankly, > yo