Re: [Clfs-support] Updating the kernel

2008-04-25 Thread Alonso Graterol
2008/4/25 David Broadfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I concur with Ken. The way I do it is I keep my orogional kernel and add > the new one as a non default option to the botloader. Then, you can play > with the kernel until U get it working perfectly with your system. Then, > change the default to the

Re: [Clfs-support] Updating the kernel

2008-04-25 Thread David Broadfoot
I concur with Ken. The way I do it is I keep my orogional kernel and add the new one as a non default option to the botloader. Then, you can play with the kernel until U get it working perfectly with your system. Then, change the default to the new kernel. Keep the old kernel available in case

Re: [Clfs-support] Updating the kernel

2008-04-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:05:17AM -0400, Alonso Graterol wrote: > Hello, > > I'm thinking on update my current 2.6.22.15 kernel to one more > recent if not the latest. I'm running a x86-64 pure 64 bit CBLFS > system. > Should I expect any trouble? Should I also update the kernel > headers? Un

[Clfs-support] Updating the kernel

2008-04-25 Thread Alonso Graterol
Hello, I'm thinking on update my current 2.6.22.15 kernel to one more recent if not the latest. I'm running a x86-64 pure 64 bit CBLFS system. Should I expect any trouble? Should I also update the kernel headers? Unless it is strictly necessary I don't want to build another system from scratch