Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

--- Jeff White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't .NET 1.2.xxx the ASP.NET > 2.0 .NET Framework's beta? OTOH, beats me where did 1.2 come from. I did quite a few system upgrades, installed WSE 2.0, WebMatrix, etc. Tony __ Do you Yahoo!? Jazz

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

--- Jeff White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm confused... > > Isn't .NET 1.2.xxx the ASP.NET > 2.0 .NET Framework's beta? I don't think so. I installed Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition Beta on another machine and got .NET Framevork v2.0 with it. It is clearly distinct from 1.2 that came with

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Tonko Juricic wrote: Huh? I think I am as confused as is C++ 2003 compiler, trying to explain this to myself! I'm confused... Isn't .NET 1.2.xxx the ASP.NET 2.0 .NET Framework's beta? And compiling the above with the 2003 compiler? Jeff

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you pinpoint anywhere that we actually reference > the unmanaged data from managed code (forcing some > marshalling), or have we successfully kept all of > the unmanaged data references within the context of > unmanaged code? I looked a

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

At 07:31 PM 12/10/2004, Tonko Juricic wrote: >--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >> You realize we missed the turn? >... >> So one is left with the question; what is c++ 2003 >> trying to accomplish, anyways? > >Huh? I think I am as confused as is C++ 2003 compiler, >trying t

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You realize we missed the turn? ... > So one is left with the question; what is c++ 2003 > trying to accomplish, anyways? Huh? I think I am as confused as is C++ 2003 compiler, trying to explain this to myself! This is partly due to (I thi

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

At 04:00 PM 12/10/2004, Tonko Juricic wrote: >I don't think structure size can possibly matter >because, if any marshalling of value type (as >described in MSDN) was going on here, I can not >imagine how anything could possibly work. You realize we missed the turn? Run ildasm on the distributed

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, you declared an empty struct, not an > opaque one. > > Try > > struct apr_table_t { > char foo[]; > } > > to declare a structure of indeterminant size. All that does is cause an extra compiler warning: warning

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

At 12:51 AM 12/10/2004, Tonko Juricic wrote: >To resolve missing type metadata info I tried the >trick mentioned on: http://www.winterdom.com/mcppfaq/ >site. > >Basically I had to put the following code in >WorkerRequest.cpp: > >namespace Apache { >namespace Native { >extern "C" >{ >stru

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's twisted LOL - glad it works! Me too but I had doubts and I'm afraid it is questionable if it will continue to work in never versions. I assume that appearance of this problem indicates CLR's wish to increase 'management' of data so

Re: Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

At 12:51 AM 12/10/2004, Tonko Juricic wrote: >To resolve missing type metadata info I tried the >trick mentioned on: http://www.winterdom.com/mcppfaq/ >site. > >Basically I had to put the following code in >WorkerRequest.cpp: > >namespace Apache { >namespace Native { >extern "C" >{ >stru

Finally works! (was: CLR wants all APR types)

To resolve missing type metadata info I tried the trick mentioned on: http://www.winterdom.com/mcppfaq/ site. Basically I had to put the following code in WorkerRequest.cpp: namespace Apache { namespace Native { extern "C" { struct apr_table_t {}; struct apr_bucket_alloc_t {};

Re: CLR wants all APR types

--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can I suggest something? Try uninstalling the > package you downloaded as .msi. > ... Bill, Unfortunately, even if I tried to be precise and cautious with building, registering and unregistering sequence, the problem remains. I used ILD

Re: CLR wants all APR types

At 11:22 PM 12/8/2004, Tonko Juricic wrote: >I am running Apache 2.0.52 on Windows Server 2003 with >.NET Framework v1.2.30703. Hmmm. Have tested 1.0 and 1.1 frameworks fairly thoroughly... but... >After installing mod_aspdotnet v2.0.0 with MSI >installer and starting .NET application I was get

CLR wants all APR types

I am running Apache 2.0.52 on Windows Server 2003 with .NET Framework v1.2.30703. After installing mod_aspdotnet v2.0.0 with MSI installer and starting .NET application I was getting this error: mod_aspdotnet: Failed to create ASP.NET Request, ... HandleRequest: Failed with unexpected Exception;