#x27;t actually tried to write any code to do it... more mental
gymnastics to consider it.
Any reason you didn't got the SWIG route?
Dave Viner
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
>
> > The purpose of this list is discussion pertaining to the development of
&
eep a relatively accurate up-to-the-minute list of which
nodes are available.
I assume this is roughly how the connection pooling classes would attempt
it.
Dave Viner
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Morton wrote:
> Ops, should be
>
> Round robin DNS is just the *wrong* approach, whe
't useful. Just that it's not
clear that creating a new QL isn't a recipe for solving all
connection/interface challenges.
Dave Viner
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Some of you might already be aware, but I recently proposed a query
> language as an a
