On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:50:45 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>>> I think we need to have the "whole picture" tested to make sure everything
>>> does as we expect. It isn't so easy to tell even from looking at the source
>>> of ImageIcon. Then spec'ed so developers know what to expect. When I wrote
>>> a
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:50:45 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>>> I think we need to have the "whole picture" tested to make sure everything
>>> does as we expect. It isn't so easy to tell even from looking at the source
>>> of ImageIcon. Then spec'ed so developers know what to expect. When I wrote
>>> a
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:50:45 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> > > I think we need to have the "whole picture" tested to make sure
> > > everything does as we expect. It isn't so easy to tell even from looking
> > > at the source of ImageIcon. Then spec'ed so developers know what to
> > > expect. When I
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 06:00:21 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> > I think we need to have the "whole picture" tested to make sure everything
> > does as we expect. It isn't so easy to tell even from looking at the source
> > of ImageIcon. Then spec'ed so developers know what to expect. When I wro
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 09:43:34 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> > But all-in-all I guess this description change can go in separate PR along
> > with [above
> > change](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25767#discussion_r2164102520)
>
> Have anyone submit a bug to address this deficiency? If not, I'
