On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:08:41 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> > I am not seeing a lot of value in this churn in completely OK code.
>
> Can't say I see that code as "OK".
> Hashtable usage in 2024 brings eye bleeding for most of developers.
> Specifying incorrect initial size adds even more _fun_.
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:21:31 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>I am not seeing a lot of value in this churn in completely OK code.
Can't say I see that code as "OK".
Hashtable usage in 2024 brings eye bleeding for most of developers.
Specifying incorrect initial size adds even more _fun_.
>Instead please f
> If a thread-safe implementation is not needed, it is recommended to use
> HashMap instead of legacy synchronized Hashtable.
> Map `CSS.htmlAttrToCssAttrMap` is modified only within static initialization
> block and then only `get` method is called.
>
> The only subtle difference is that Hasht
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:02:14 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> If a thread-safe implementation is not needed, it is recommended to use
> HashMap instead of legacy synchronized Hashtable.
> Map `CSS.htmlAttrToCssAttrMap` is modified only within static initialization
> block and then only `get` meth
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:02:14 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> If a thread-safe implementation is not needed, it is recommended to use
> HashMap instead of legacy synchronized Hashtable.
> Map `CSS.htmlAttrToCssAttrMap` is modified only within static initialization
> block and then only `get` meth
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:02:14 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> If a thread-safe implementation is not needed, it is recommended to use
> HashMap instead of legacy synchronized Hashtable.
> Map `CSS.htmlAttrToCssAttrMap` is modified only within static initialization
> block and then only `get` meth
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:36:28 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> If a thread-safe implementation is not needed, it is recommended to use
>> HashMap instead of legacy synchronized Hashtable.
>> Map `CSS.htmlAttrToCssAttrMap` is modified only within static initialization
>> block and then only `get`
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:41:40 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
>> @turbanoff Based on your explanation, it sounds reasonable to convert
>> CSS.htmlAttrToCssAttrMap from Hashtable to HashMap since synchronization may
>> not be required.
>>
>> There are few more Hashtables - `styleConstantToCssMap,
>
