On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:50:54 GMT, Anass Baya wrote:
> This test was designed to manually verify that clicking on the JComboBox when
> the frame containing it is about to close does not cause an
> IllegalStateException.
>
> The test allowed the tester extra time to click on the JComboBox when c
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:51:24 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able to
> run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>
> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
> and test the
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:51:24 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able to
> run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>
> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
> and test the
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:10:29 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
>> Attaching jdk_awt jtreg results (with and without fix).
>> [jdk-awt-results.tgz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/19430946/jdk-awt-results.tgz)
>
>> @zzambers Sorry for my late reaction. Is it possible to add test result by
>>
On Thu, 8 May 2025 16:04:53 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able
>> to run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>>
>> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
>> and
On Mon, 5 May 2025 17:44:25 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> The `java/awt/Toolkit/Headless/HeadlessToolkit.java` test covers some
> functionality of various methods in the `HeadlessToolkit` class, specifically
> whether these methods throw a `HeadlessException` or not. The image-related
> method
This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able to
run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests and
test the change (it will finally be changed to 1.0 in JDK-8260555). The n
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:51:24 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able to
> run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>
> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
> and test the
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:51:24 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able to
> run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>
> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
> and test the
On Wed, 7 May 2025 22:23:02 GMT, Daniel Gredler wrote:
>> On other platforms like Windows and Linux, the `\n`, `\r` and `\t`
>> characters are ignored when drawing text to a `Graphics2D` object. On macOS
>> this is not currently the case.
>>
>> See, for example, `CMap.getControlCodeGlyph(int,
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:51:24 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able to
> run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>
> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
> and test the
We've not been doing regular automated testing on macoS 15.4 and it is well
over-due.
Extensive testing (all tests run 100 times) reports 3 tests that always fail on
macOS 15.4 that we should problem list to enable it.
-
Commit messages:
- 8346683
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org
> Test was failing on Ubuntu, looks to be a synchronous error in the test so I
> rewrote it to improve stability.
Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- remove author, update summary
- revert test, add logging
--
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:51:24 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able to
> run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>
> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
> and test the
On Tue, 6 May 2025 23:24:48 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> > I've updated the test to include logging and ran the test 200x without
> > failures. I think it's ok to push the test with these changes so that if
> > the test ever does fail again we can use the logs and analyze the problem.
>
> I m
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:13:12 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote:
>> Currently on macOS when mouseMove is given an offscreen coordinate to move
>> the mouse to, mouseMove will physically clamp to the edge of the screen, but
>> if you try to grab the mouse location immediately after by using
>> MouseInfo.g
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:10:58 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
>> Alisen Chung has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 22 commits:
>>
>> - merge
>> - update specifications, replace default values in specifications with
On Thu, 8 May 2025 16:43:10 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
>> This change tries to add timeout to individual testcases so that I am able
>> to run them with a timeout factor of 1 in the future (JDK-8260555).
>>
>> The first commit changes the timeout factor to 0.7, so that I can run tests
>> and test
On Thu, 8 May 2025 18:30:11 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> The -Wtype-limits warning was previously disabled in the OpenJDK build for
> LCMS 2.14+ due to upstream issues: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11217
> The issue was reported to the LCMS project:
> https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/i
On Thu, 8 May 2025 17:03:03 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
>> doc/testing.md line 385:
>>
>>> 383: (`-timeoutFactor`). Also, some test cases that programmatically wait a
>>> 384: certain amount of time will apply this factor. If we run in
>>> 385: interpreted mode (`-Xcomp`), [RunTest.gmk](../make/RunT
On Thu, 8 May 2025 21:52:21 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> We've not been doing regular automated testing on macoS 15.4 and it is well
> over-due.
>
> Extensive testing (all tests run 100 times) reports 3 tests that always fail
> on macOS 15.4 that we should problem list to enable it.
Marked as revi
The -Wtype-limits warning was previously disabled in the OpenJDK build for LCMS
2.14+ due to upstream issues: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11217
The issue was reported to the LCMS project:
https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/issues/458
It has since been fixed in LCMS 2.17 and integrated into
On Thu, 8 May 2025 18:30:11 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> The -Wtype-limits warning was previously disabled in the OpenJDK build for
> LCMS 2.14+ due to upstream issues: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11217
> The issue was reported to the LCMS project:
> https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/i
On Thu, 8 May 2025 18:30:11 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> The -Wtype-limits warning was previously disabled in the OpenJDK build for
> LCMS 2.14+ due to upstream issues: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11217
> The issue was reported to the LCMS project:
> https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/i
24 matches
Mail list logo
