A little more info: failed on Windows XP, SP3.
Worked great for me on Linux.
Cliff
On Sep 20, 5:54 am, Christopher Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw, showMessageDialog being a static method, isn't the preferred syntax
>
> (javax.swing.JOptionPane/showMessageDialog nil "Hello World!")
>
>
Exactly. Here's some demo code, attached, that uses a cell in a
JPanel. This is a simple example, but maybe it shows how this could
be useful when you have many objects with complex dependencies.
-Stuart
On Sep 20, 7:54 pm, kyle smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you could attach a cell to
On Sep 20, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> That would be useful when you need to create an array of an abstract
> type, like an interface. I posted a version here:
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/1c02773d070decd5
It's good to see another use case. Not surprisingly, the Clo
On Sep 20, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:Hmm.. there is already make-array for the latter:(make-array String 0)find-doc is your friend :)Cool, thanks. I had looked up "array", but hadn't looked carefully at all that it returned.As far as into-array taking a type, I'm fine with that, but the
On Sep 20, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Mike Hinchey wrote:
> I added support for *1 *2 *3 in my fork of swank-clojure (for emacs/
> slime), http://github.com/mikehinchey/swank-clojure.
I'm glad to see this support in swank-clojure. Thanks!
> I did one thing different which is to not reset the vars if the
Maybe you could attach a cell to a JComponent and call setEnabled as
necessary.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
I added support for *1 *2 *3 in my fork of swank-clojure (for emacs/
slime), http://github.com/mikehinchey/swank-clojure.
I did one thing different which is to not reset the vars if the eval
is one of the vars themselves. Rich noted most CL repls don't do
this, but it seems useful to me. Though
On Sep 20, 11:16 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as into-array taking a type, I'm fine with that, but the type
> should come first.
That would be useful when you need to create an array of an abstract
type, like an interface. I posted a version here:
http://groups.google.com/
Thanks a lot! It's funny that you wrote this post now because I was
about to try to figure it out myself this week-end.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send ema
On Sep 20, 11:04 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I needed an empty array of Strings to pass to a Java function. The
> first place I considered was "into-array", but without an array
> element to work with, it returns an array of Object.
>
> I suggest that into-array be exte
I needed an empty array of Strings to pass to a Java function. The
first place I considered was "into-array", but without an array
element to work with, it returns an array of Object.
I suggest that into-array be extended to allow a second argument that
gives the type of the elements in the
I needed a single jar file that if you double clicked
on it (be in Mac OS X or Windows) it will just launch
my Clojure App.
No CLASSPATH or bash or anything, cross platform.
I didn't found anything like these so I just made it
(I know it's not difficult, let say this is for Newbie!)
The archi i
Consider:
user=> (defn foo [ {:keys [a b] :or {c 5}} ]
(list a b))
#'user/foo
Note that the key of the default entry for "c" is not in the formal
parameter list.
user=> (foo 7)
(nil nil)
user=> (foo {:a 3 :b 4})
(3 4)
user=> (foo {:a 3 :c 4})
(3 nil)
The second is of cours
btw, showMessageDialog being a static method, isn't the preferred syntax
(javax.swing.JOptionPane/showMessageDialog nil "Hello World!")
both versions work here (standard OSX Java).
$ java -version
java version "1.5.0_13"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_13-
b05-237
14 matches
Mail list logo
