Dan Larkin d...@danlarkin.org writes:
Name: clojure-json
URL: http://github.com/danlarkin/clojure-json/
Author: Dan Larkin
Tags: parsing, web, data-interchange
License: BSD
Dependencies: clojure-contrib (only for running tests)
Description:
A JSON encoder/decoder for clojure. Supports
Lancet
http://github.com/stuarthalloway/lancet
Stuart Halloway
Developer tool
Same License as Clojure
Lancet is a build tool like Ant or Rake. Lancet makes it easy to
create build targets: any Clojure function can be a build target.
Lancet can call Ant tasks, or shell out and call other
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Greg Harman ghar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hank:
I have looked at TC in the past, and took another look today at your
suggestion. Terracotta certainly seems to have promise feature-wise,
but I have to admit it's a heavier solution than I had been thinking
of, and
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Achim Passen achim.pas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Am 29.01.2009 um 23:52 schrieb Mark Volkmann:
I'd like for that to be moved to core so I don't have to load it ...
which is also verbose for something that is commonly needed.
includes? being commonly needed
Hi Stuart,
On Jan 30, 1:43 pm, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
I have put together a another implementation of Cells.
Cool!
One of the things I really like about Cells is that it can really take
the pain out of MVC style GUI building:
The new library page is here:
http://clojure.org/libraries
Keep 'em coming!
Rich
On Jan 29, 10:04 am, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
People regularly post here about Clojure libraries they are working
on, and it is great to see the explosion of new libs for Clojure!
I'd like to
Thanks, Tim, glad you like it. I agree one of the most interesting
uses for Cells is GUI programming. I'd love to see a library for
building Swing GUIs this way, although I would want to keep the GUI
functions separate from the cell library itself.
From the libraries thread, I can see that
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:24 AM, e evier...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, I'll check that stuff out. Thanks.
It occurs to me this is being compared to something in ruby called
partition. I like that name. partition-by ... but maybe it was opted to
use the simpler name, which I can appreciate.
Hi Brian,
On Jan 29, 2009, at 11:03 AM, BrianS wrote:
Now that I am beginning to really investigate this cool part of the
clojure-contrib library with SQL Server, I have hit the point where I
would like to call parameterized stored procedures, which is why you
said you changed the SQL
Hi Telman,
Thanks, I got it.
-sun
On Jan 29, 9:58 pm, Telman Yusupov use...@yusupov.com wrote:
Clojure sets the value of this var. If you call this var from REPL it
will evaluate to nil:
user= *file*
nil
If you pass a file to Clojure on the command line, Clojure will set it
to the
There is something I don't understand about Clojure. There are
multimethods (great), but I can't seem to find objects they can operate
on. I come to Clojure from a Common Lisp background, having done a fair
bit of CLOS programming. Mind you, I am not necessarily a fan of overly
complex object
I have been reading through the API examples on:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming/Examples/API_Examples.
For memfn we have:
(map (memfn charAt i) [fred ethel lucy] [1 2 3])
- (\r \h \y)
This still works, but I thought that: charAt aught to be .charAt
following the new Java
Everyman a écrit :
I have been reading through the API examples on:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming/Examples/API_Examples.
For memfn we have:
(map (memfn charAt i) [fred ethel lucy] [1 2 3])
- (\r \h \y)
This still works, but I thought that: charAt aught to be .charAt
Steve
Thanks, this works as described, I am going to look into what it would
take to do a call to a parameterized stored
proc. BTW, I did get a parameterized SP working, here is my sample
code:
(defn sp-test
test of stored procedures
[min max]
(sql/with-connection
db
At this point you have to roll your own, I have an experimental thing I plan
on fleshing out temporarily called CLJOS. I've implemented field
inheritance, type inheritance, basic multiple inheritance, basic
introspection. Search the mailing list for CLJOS and you'll see more
details. It only
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jan Rychter j...@rychter.com wrote:
From what I read, the reasoning is that Clojure provides extremely
general multimethods where you have to define a dispatch function. On
the object side, there is metadata and you can do with it whatever you
want. But this
On Jan 30, 3:16 pm, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the goal is to provide object-like capabilities without
needing actual objects.
Why is that the goal? I mean, the JVM provides a well defined, high
performance object oriented system. Clojure can already generate
(defn make-window [id]
{:tag ::window, :id id})
(defn make-color-window [id color]
(assoc (make-window id)
:tag ::color-window
:color color))
(derive ::color-window ::window)
(defmulti describe-window :tag)
(defmethod describe-window ::window [w]
(println Window with ID
On Jan 30, 3:16 pm, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the goal is to provide object-like capabilities without
needing actual objects.
Why is that the goal? I mean, the JVM provides a well defined, high
performance object oriented system. Clojure can already
How are people generating HTML or text documentation from their
Clojure code?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To
Related.
(defn myfunc
a nice description here
[coll]
(apply + coll))
but no
(def myvar
; cant do a nice description here, even though hash-maps can stand
in for functions.
(hash-map :a 1 :b 3))
On Jan 30, 10:42 pm, Kevin Albrecht onlya...@gmail.com wrote:
How are people generating
Hi,
Am 30.01.2009 um 22:49 schrieb bOR_:
(def myvar
; cant do a nice description here, even though hash-maps can stand
in for functions.
(hash-map :a 1 :b 3))
Currently only (def #^{:doc A Foo} foo ...) is possible.
Alternatively clojure.contrib.def/defvar:
(defvar foo
(hash-map :a :b)
On Jan 30, 2009, at 4:49 PM, bOR_ wrote:
(def myvar
; cant do a nice description here, even though hash-maps can stand
in for functions.
(hash-map :a 1 :b 3))
clojure.contrib.def/defvar offers some help with that:
-
clojure.contrib.def/defvar
A new Clojure Plugin for Netbeans is available at
http://code.google.com/p/enclojure-nb-clojure-plugin/. Some issues
addressed are:
- Enabled Windows support (only Windows XP has been tested)
- Project Support
* Enabled Clojure Project Run/Debug functionality
* Clojure Project Debugging
Some minutes ago I found out that there is a mismatch between my
interpretation of lazy-cats docstring and the actual behaviour of that
macro.
Its docstring says:
Expands to code which yields a lazy sequence of the concatenation
of the supplied colls. Each coll expr is not evaluated until it
Name: Dejcartes
URL: http://www.markmfredrickson.com/code
Category: reporting, UI
License: LGPL
Depends: JFreeChart (included with source)
A wrapper around JFreeChart (jfree.org), a Java graphing/charting
libraries. Allows use of native Clojure collections in charts (e.g.
pie charts, scatter
Using #^{:doc ...} documents the code, but are there any tools out
there for creating HTML API documentation from the documented code?
Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
(def
#^{:doc a nice description here}
myvar
(hash-map :a 1 :b 3))
Mmm, I could create a third namespace that contained the common
functionality. But it is an artificial separation. If a user read
through the source code, he would think why is this code separated
into two files, when it's dealing with the same thing?
Anyway, here's my use-case:
I wrote a
user= (take 0 (lazy-cat [(println 10)] [(println 20)]))
10
nil
What you see here is not an issue with lazy-cat, but rather an issue
with take. The current implementation of take evaluates one more than
the n passed to it.
So in this case, 1 element of the seq is evaluated and 10 is printed.
I
I think this behavior is as-intended, although I agree that it is
confusing.
The reason for this stems from the fact that lazy-cat returns a seq,
and the only allowed representation for the empty seq is nil (i.e.,
Java null). Thus, lazy-cat must always do enough evaluation to know
whether to
On Jan 30, 5:44 pm, Daniel Renfer d...@kronkltd.net wrote:
user= (take 0 (lazy-cat [(println 10)] [(println 20)]))
10
nil
What you see here is not an issue with lazy-cat, but rather an issue
with take. The current implementation of take evaluates one more than
the n passed to it.
Hmm, I
Hi Kevin,
You should try clj-doc:
http://github.com/mmcgrana/clj-doc
clj-doc generates HTML API documentation that is searchable via
JavaScript and includes source snippets for the code that defined each
var.
I update clj-doc tonight to include example docs, just clone my
clj-doc repo and
While contains? treats Clojure maps and java.util.Maps the same, it
doesn't seem to work on java.util.Sets:
user (let [m (HashMap.)] (.put m test test) (contains? m test))
true
user (let [s (HashSet.)] (.add s test) (contains? s test))
false
user (let [s (HashSet.)] (.add s test) (contains? (set
Doing something like Datalog would be terrific fun. I might
contribute if there is interest.
I'm not an academic, so most of my contributions would be on a
practical level. We'd need someone else to provide the deeper aspects
of theory.
I've read Norvig's book, and understand his code, and my
Does anyone know of a gentle introduction to the Zipper stuff, and how
it is used in Clojure?
Thanks in advance.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Mark,
Glad to see you are putting some more work into clj-doc again. I tried
compiling it a couple weeks ago, and after I downloaded the 4 or 5
libraries it depended on and fixed some of the references to code that
had been moved, I got an exception when I tried running it. I gave up
after that.
Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely
hillarious:
http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Agreed :)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote:
Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely
hillarious:
http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
38 matches
Mail list logo
