Hi,
2009/7/25 jan jan.mare...@gmail.com
Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/24 pcda...@gmail.com pcda...@gmail.com
On Jul 23, 10:15 pm, Richard Newman holyg...@gmail.com wrote:
Coming from an OO background which puts a strong focus on data
Hi people!
Thanks for the answers, Wilson, Richard.
Yesterday, I could clone the CLR branch from github (github hates my
IE7 browser, I switched to FireFox):
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-clr/tree/master
I found in the code the kind of test I was looking for. Just curious:
any attempt
Hi,
Am 25.07.2009 um 15:08 schrieb ajlopez:
1) Why the fn special form receives an array as list of parameters?
That is, why Clojure is using:
(fn [x y]
instead of
(fn (x y) ...
or both
Any rationale behing this decision?
In Clojure vectors are used everywhere, where
the grouping
That's a general problem with multiple threads printing to the same
stream, and not something that can be easily avoided.
-Stuart
On Jul 25, 12:48 pm, ronen nark...@gmail.com wrote:
Iv stumbled this also when using Threads, (http://
Looking at the source ARef.java, I see that the validate method will
throw an IllegalStateException if the validator function either
returns false or throws a non-RuntimeException. The setValidator
method immediately validates the Ref using the new validator function.
It always throws a
Should I use this mailing list to suggest changes to the Clojure
implementation or some other avenue?
Some suggestions I may have are pretty simple.
For example, in LockingTransaction.java I see:
ref.validate(ref.getValidator(), e.getValue());
That could be replaced by:
On Jul 25, 3:20 pm, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I use this mailing list to suggest changes to the Clojure
implementation or some other avenue?
Some suggestions I may have are pretty simple.
For example, in LockingTransaction.java I see:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Rich Hickeyrichhic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 25, 3:20 pm, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I use this mailing list to suggest changes to the Clojure
implementation or some other avenue?
Some suggestions I may have are pretty simple.
I wonder if any of the Clojurians on here might like to describe how
one might write the factorial function as a parallel one? Taking
advantage of the associativity of multiplication, along the lines of
16! = (((1*2)*(3*4)) * ((5*6)*(7*8))) * (((9*10)*(11*12)) * ((13*14)*
(15*16)))
On Jul 24,
Hi
2009/7/25 ajlopez ajlopez2...@gmail.com:
[...]
from loop* to loop, let* to let, fn* to fn... Are all *-ended names
special forms?
[...]
No, you can name your own functions/macros something* if you want to.
The * at the end normally just means that this function/macro is
similar to the one
The parallel library wraps the ForkJoin library scheduled for
inclusion in JDK 7:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/index.html
You'll need jsr166y.jar in your classpath in order to use this
library.
(use '(clojure.parallel))
(clojure.parallel/preduce * (range 2 16))
On Jul 26,
11 matches
Mail list logo
