justinhj writes:
> I tried passing *out* to my thread function and then binding it to
> *out* in the thread, and this works but then makes the threads execute
> one at a time, and I'm presuming that is because my use of *out* in
> the binding block is blocking for the other threads which use it.
On 12/26/2010 8:33 PM, Robert McIntyre wrote:
That's really cool. I was _just reading_ your comments from 2006 at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gardeners@lispniks.com/msg01006.html and
wondering about how hard something like this would be to write. If
possible, could you expand on how one might
On 12/26/2010 9:56 PM, Praki Prakash wrote:
Tim,
This approach is very interesting. My choice of mode for LP has always
been noweb-mode but it doesn't seem to work with my version of emacs
anymore. My current approach is to embed prose and clojure code in a
latex document and generate a .te
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
> > Ken Wesson writes:
> >
> >>> Actually you don't need to AOT compile records or types. They work fine
> >>> for interactive development.
> >>
> >> Eh. That's not what I saw written elsew
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
>> Ken Wesson writes:
>>
Actually you don't need to AOT compile records or types. They work fine
for interactive development.
>>>
>>> Eh. That's not what I saw written elsewhere.
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
> Ken Wesson writes:
>
>>> Actually you don't need to AOT compile records or types. They work fine
>>> for interactive development.
>>
>> Eh. That's not what I saw written elsewhere. Or is it just protocols?
>> Though usually those are used han
Tim,
This approach is very interesting. My choice of mode for LP has always been
noweb-mode but it doesn't seem to work with my version of emacs anymore. My
current approach is to embed prose and clojure code in a latex document and
generate a .tex file with formatted clojure code and .clj contain
Ken Wesson writes:
>> Actually you don't need to AOT compile records or types. They work fine
>> for interactive development.
>
> Eh. That's not what I saw written elsewhere. Or is it just protocols?
> Though usually those are used hand-in-hand with records.
Perhaps you're thinking of gen-class?
Sunil S Nandihalli writes:
> thanks Alex for your response . I tried it ... It compiled fine .. but the
> double dispatch does not seem to work correctly ..
>
> It some how reverses the arguments and then dispatches to the correct
> function for the reversed arguments and the function works prop
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
> Ken Wesson writes:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
>
>>> Struct maps were in the language for a long time before defrecord was
>>> added. Records are supposed to replace them for most purposes. So if
>>> in doubt
thanks Alex for your response . I tried it ... It compiled fine .. but the
double dispatch does not seem to work correctly ..
It some how reverses the arguments and then dispatches to the correct
function for the reversed arguments and the function works properly ..
i.e.
when I do (- (Complex. 1
That's really cool. I was _just reading_ your comments from 2006 at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gardeners@lispniks.com/msg01006.html and
wondering about how hard something like this would be to write. If
possible, could you expand on how one might use this in a development
work-flow with emacs or
Ken Wesson writes:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
>> Struct maps were in the language for a long time before defrecord was
>> added. Records are supposed to replace them for most purposes. So if
>> in doubt between the two use a defrecord.
>
> Isn't one advantage of st
Sunil S Nandihalli writes:
> http://paste.lisp.org/display/93387
>
> It uses protocols and deftype I noticed that it was an old post .. I
> could not get it to compile to try it out.. I was complaining about
> likes of trying to convert a name-space-qualified to a type name
> .. w.r.t ::Complex .
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
> Damon Snyder writes:
>
>> One of the decisions I wasn't sure about was whether to use a protocol
>> or a struct map for the (socket, reader, writer) tuple. I started
>> using a struct-map and then switched over to defprotocol/defrecord.
>> Se
Damon Snyder writes:
> One of the decisions I wasn't sure about was whether to use a protocol
> or a struct map for the (socket, reader, writer) tuple. I started
> using a struct-map and then switched over to defprotocol/defrecord.
> See
> https://github.com/drsnyder/beanstalk/blob/82f301f1f825b
I don't have any publicly available jetty/clojure/websocket code. I'll see if I
can throw something together tomorrow.
Cheers, Jay
On Dec 24, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Sean Allen wrote:
> Jay,
>
> Do you have any publicly released code I could take a look at?
> I've only found a couple of jetty/cloju
Hi everyone,
I was in the project euler page and i tried to solve the question 8 using
clojure. No big deal, was really cool.
So , i cant figure out what is the time complexity for the *code* below
I thought that was O(n^2), but running the code for different input seems
that the complexity
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Glen Rubin wrote:
> Can I do the following without using loops??
>
> I have list, e.g.
>
> '(4 6 66 33 26 6 83 5)
>
> I want to partition it so that I get a subset of lists that build up
> to the original:
>
> ( (4) (4 6) (4 6 66) (4 6 66 33) )
(defn sublists
What do people use for logging debug output from threads? Either
native threads created with Thread. or implicit threads via agents or
pmap etc?
I tried passing *out* to my thread function and then binding it to
*out* in the thread, and this works but then makes the threads execute
one at a time,
> But one issue I encountered with defprotocol is that there appears to
> be a possible symbol table/space issue. When I compile, I get warnings
> like the following:
>
> Warning: protocol #'beanstalk.core/BeanstalkObject is overwriting
> function read
> Warning: protocol #'beanstalk.core/Beanstalk
Hello,
In an effort to learn a little more about clojure (and possibly
introduce it at work) I decided to write a native client for the
Beanstalk work queue. See http://kr.github.com/beanstalkd/ for more
information about the queue and https://github.com/drsnyder/beanstalk
for the client.
One of t
I don't know why I thought Java used UTF-8, thank you for the
correction. So yeah, would be interesting to see the tests on C done
with wide char in UTF-16.
On Dec 26, 1:54 am, Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
> On 26 December 2010 03:00, Ivan wrote:
>
> > Would be interesting to see tests done on UTF-8
Hello everybody,
I have a numerically intensive code. after getting it to work I started
profiling the code .. and zeroed down that my complex number operations are
the most called functions and probably among the slowest due to my naive
implementation. The code I am using is in the following post
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:53 AM, rob levy wrote:
> Hi Anders, thanks. If I understand what you are asking, in fact the server
> in my case does not care if anyone is listening, however you can set how
> long the messages live in the queue. The client holds the responsibility of
> keeping track o
25 matches
Mail list logo
