In Clojure 1.2, I tried this:
(read-string
(binding [*print-dup* true]
(print-str (subvec [1 2 3] 1
But I get a java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No matching method found:
create
I had something else print-dup'ed out onto disk and when I read it back in
it gave me that
Bluefish does not work that way.It will indent to the last
indentation in all cases. I've never used EMacs, but all the editors
I've ever used work indenting the same way. All I can suggest is
that you ask the Bluefish users group if there is a way to do what you
want.
On Mar 16, 9:16
On Mar 17, 2011, at 7:16 AM, WoodHacker wrote:
Bluefish does not work that way.It will indent to the last
indentation in all cases. I've never used EMacs, but all the editors
I've ever used work indenting the same way. All I can suggest is
that you ask the Bluefish users group if
`print-dup` on any collection type generates code to call the `create`
method of the collection's class. `APersistentVector$SubVector` is missing
a `create` method.
-Stuart Sierra
clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post
On 17 March 2011 12:05, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
FWIW the feature I describe (syntax-aware auto-indenting) is common in the
Lisp world, not only in emacs but also (to name just a few that are fresh in
my memory) in MCL, DrScheme and LispWorks.
It's also common in many other
Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules that SLIME uses
to auto-indent code? I'd like to tell the Bluefish community what it would be
nice to have in their Clojure mode. I've tried some web searches and found this
surprisingly hard to dig up -- tons of stuff on
You find hard to tell the rules, and so did I.
And that's why I've tried to do with ccw the simplest thing that would be
better than nothing as far as auto indentation is concerned.
2011/3/17 Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu
Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules
Hi,
On 17 Mrz., 16:24, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules that SLIME
uses to auto-indent code? I'd like to tell the Bluefish community what it
would be nice to have in their Clojure mode. I've tried some web searches and
Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu writes:
Hi Lee,
Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules that
SLIME uses to auto-indent code?
AFAICT, SLIME doesn't have on own indentation function but uses standard
emacs lisp-mode indentation. That can be tweaked somehow, to provide
I have the following definitions and am trying to use the strint macro
() to perform string substitutions.
test1=(use 'clojure.contrib.strint)
test1= (def m {:XYZ 1, :ABC 2})
test1= (def q select ~(:XYZ m) from ~(:ABC m))
The following works when I specify my string directly:
test1= ( select
Hi,
here are the special cases for 2 above is currently defined as default
in VimClojure:
setlocal
lispwords=def,def-,defn,defn-,defmacro,defmacro-,defmethod,defmulti
setlocal lispwords
+=defonce,defvar,defvar-,defunbound,let,fn,letfn,binding,proxy
setlocal lispwords
There do have to be at least a few other rules, however, e.g. about how far to
outdent after an expression closes.
-Lee
On Mar 17, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Lee Spector wrote:
Thanks Meikel!
On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
I believe the Vim indentation for Lisp works
On Mar 17, 8:34 am, Bhinderwala, Shoeb
sabhinderw...@wellington.com wrote:
...use the strint *MACRO*...
...works when I specify my string [as a literal]...
...but doesn't work when I pass the string through a variable.
Macros are not functions. is receiving as arguments a list with the
two
Is clojureql powerful and flexible enough to support custom dynamic SQL with
tons of joins, database function invocations in the SELECT clause, sub-selects,
unions, etc.?
Most of our applications are written in Java and we have been doing parameter
substitution sometimes using string variables
Hi,
Am 17.03.2011 um 17:33 schrieb Lee Spector:
There do have to be at least a few other rules, however, e.g. about how far
to outdent after an expression closes.
Then you are either at the toplevel = indent 0. Or you are inside another (, [
or { which leads to the previous description.
Hi,
Am 17.03.2011 um 18:11 schrieb Alan:
From my uninformed position, strint looks like it should have been
written as a function, not a macro, but probably there are reasons it
was not.
It can't be „simply“ a function, because then it has no access to the local
environment.
(let [x 99]
On Mar 17, 11:00 am, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 17.03.2011 um 18:11 schrieb Alan:
From my uninformed position, strint looks like it should have been
written as a function, not a macro, but probably there are reasons it
was not.
It can't be „simply“ a function,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:35 PM, James Reeves jree...@weavejester.com wrote:
On 17 March 2011 12:05, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
FWIW the feature I describe (syntax-aware auto-indenting) is common in the
Lisp world, not only in emacs but also (to name just a few that are fresh in
Lee, while we're at it.
I decided to finally give it a try, and so I implemented an alternate
behaviour for smart indent for ccw : the version of the gist does the
following : it uses the following function to test whether we should indent
by 2 or align with the first call argument :
(def
Emacs-using Clojurians may enjoy the following tidbit of
Slime I just dreamed of:
(defun slime-eval-at-register (reg)
Take the cursor to a register's location and eval
the expression there. Useful for testing stuff without
having to 'go there' first.
(interactive cEval at register: )
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Lee, while we're at it.
I decided to finally give it a try, and so I implemented an alternate
behaviour for smart indent for ccw : the version of the gist does the
following : it uses the following function to test
On Mar 17, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Alan wrote:
On Mar 17, 11:00 am, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 17.03.2011 um 18:11 schrieb Alan:
From my uninformed position, strint looks like it should have been
written as a function, not a macro, but probably there are reasons it
was
Hi,
I wanted to take the opportunity to thank the people who responded to
my question on thinking beyond O-O. The replies form a very useful
slice through Clojure design strategies and idiomatic use of the
language.
Thanks!
Stu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
