This is great stuff: thank you! I can totally see this being the kind
of thing like destructuring, where once you've used it you won't want
to go back :)
--
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
I've tried pprint and found it lacking as it inserts newlines in
awkward places apart from the medatada/comments issue mentioned.
Are you using pprint with code-dispatch? That tends to work a lot
better, though it will put newlines where it deems fit. This is either
a good thing or a bad thing
Many thanks for adding this feature. Without it the Clojure code would
have been left in the dust.
On Aug 9, 11:46 pm, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Shoeb Bhinderwala
shoeb.bhinderw...@gmail.com wrote:
With these options added the Clojure code
Hi David,
Looks really neat!
Just to clarify, you can extend the matching to new types but the match is
'closed' in the sense that unlike mutimethods you can't add additional
cases? Is that correct?
Hope that makes sense,
James Sofra
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi James,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:43 PM, James Sofra james.so...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify, you can extend the matching to new types but the match is
'closed' in the sense that unlike mutimethods you can't add additional
cases? Is that correct?
For the 0.1 release, that is correct.
Thanks Sumil.
Does anyone know what algorithm they are implementing? It looks like a wheel
factorization but I can't tell from lack ofcomments.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Thanks Shantanu and Daniel.
I am trying to merge some functionality from two different projects, so the
credentials could be stored in properties file or the project.clj file. And
mine is not a leiningen plugin so I parsed the project.clj file.
--
You received this message because you are
If anyone is interested, I have a group for talking about Marginalia
and the art of documentation and code reading. Various other topics
will be fair-game (within reason).
Follow this link if you dare: http://groups.google.com/group/marginalia-clj
--
You received this message because you are
Hi,
I just wanted to announce the arrival of the newly-born at-at library - freshly
extracted from Overtone:
https://github.com/overtone/at-at
at-at is an ahead-of-time function scheduler which essentially provides a
friendly wrapper around Java's ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.
Enjoy!
Sam
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Sam Aaron samaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to announce the arrival of the newly-born at-at library -
freshly extracted from Overtone:
https://github.com/overtone/at-at
at-at is an ahead-of-time function scheduler which essentially provides a
:use … :only doesn't have the problems of full :use.
Enhancement ticket and patch for :use … :only welcome. Note it must support
:use … :only only, i.e. :only is required.
Rich
On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:01 AM, David Nolen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com
See also David Nolan's post:
http://dosync.posterous.com/lispers-know-the-value-of-everything-and-the
Justin
On Tuesday, August 9, 2011 6:02:00 PM UTC-4, pmbauer wrote:
For the sieve, if performance matters, clojure's native data structures may
not be the best choice.
A mutable array of
There is a function in a library I am using that I want to have rebound to a
function of mine for all threads, and can't seem to figure this out, or if
it is even possible. binding, push-thread-bindings, in-ns with def, etc.
are not working, seemingly because they are only rebinding for the
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com wrote:
Is what I am trying to do possible?
alter-var-root
Handle with care.
--
Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?!
Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true
hacker. Not as clumsy or
Is what I am trying to do possible?
Even if you can, I don't think you want to. This sort of thing would
basically remove the immutable nature of Clojure. Instead I would
recommend using a atom...
Timothy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
I think I found a small bug in clojure.core/bases. Extending the
existing unit test reveals it:
(deftest test-bases
(are [x y] (= x y)
(bases java.lang.Math)
(list java.lang.Object)
(bases java.lang.Integer)
(list java.lang.Number java.lang.Comparable) )
(is
alter-var-root
It is still somehow using the original binding. I am trying change the
binding from aot compiled code, would that change anything?
Even if you can, I don't think you want to.
I agree, I don't want to, however, I am trying to get multiple third party
libraries to play together,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com wrote:
alter-var-root
It is still somehow using the original binding. I am trying change the
binding from aot compiled code, would that change anything?
Yes. The compiler probably optimized away the var lookup to an
Yes. The compiler probably optimized away the var lookup to an
embedded constant. You'll need to use an atom, as Baldridge suggested.
My code calls a function in 3rd party library A, which in turn calls a
function in 3rd party library B. The lib B function uses blacklisted Java
classes, causing
I haven't read the code yet but I have a few questions:
Do you miss backbone.js? Are you going to use it with cljs?
Have you shared any code between the frontend and backend? As in run the
same functions on both sides. If so, are you duplicating the code in both
.clj and .cljs or doing something
My code calls a function in 3rd party library A, which in turn calls a
function in 3rd party library B. The lib B function uses blacklisted Java
classes, causing my app to crash when lib A calls it. I would like to
replace that function with a safe version, so that lib A is forced to use
Thank you both for the help.
If it's really this serious of an issue, then perhaps the
makers of the libraries will at least accept a patch from you that
adds a hook that will swap out parts of the libraries.
Not a serious issue by any means, but I will see what the sentiment is with
the library
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com wrote:
The lib B function uses blacklisted Java classes, ...
Blacklisted???
--
Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?!
Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true
hacker. Not as clumsy or
Or, more accurately, not whitelisted, on App Engine.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com
wrote:
The lib B function uses blacklisted Java classes, ...
Blacklisted???
--
Protege: What
What is the best way to pass Clojure vectors and maps to JavaScript
functions?
Currently when I need to call a JavaScript function that takes an
array I do something like
(js/my_js_fn (.array (vector 1 2 3)))
and I pass Clojure maps like
(js/my_js_fn (.strobj (hash-map a 1 b 2)))
This
For what it may be worth to you:
In trying out the Noir framework (which neatly assembles
ring+compojure+hiccup+other stuff) for its new bindings to ClojureScript
(using noir-cljs and pivot), I thought some people might like to see what
kind of diff is needed to add basic ClojureScript support
Good on you. I've been looking to find a reliable way to have Javascript
unit testing run in a v8 (or any JS) shell. I've tried Jasmine and am now
trying Google Closure's unit testing framework, but have so far come up
short.
Have you come up with anything that works? For now, i'm just having
i would love to read other community-member's opinion
on pinot noir ...
I've gotten into these over the last week, and I've got to say, Chris is
doing a very nice job on these frameworks. They are really turning into a
nicely integrated offering to develop Clojure and ClojureScript web apps.
I've gotten into these over the last week, and I've got to say, Chris is
doing a very nice job on these frameworks. They are really turning into a
nicely integrated offering to develop Clojure and ClojureScript web apps.
So...I've been wanting to get into using Cljs recently for a project
I'm
29 matches
Mail list logo
