On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.comwrote:
In fact, your statement is wrong as to very basic economics. The value of
being there at the conference isn't alterable by something that
Ah! Got what you mean, thanks a lot :)
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:52:39 AM UTC+2, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
2013/3/25 Ryan areka...@gmail.com javascript:
Thanks for your input Herwig.
When talking to a database, there might already be record and
list-of-records interface, for step 2.
What exactly is getting compiled into a class here? Not the map itself, I
believe; that wouldn't even cause this error.
From general clues, the code that builds your config map is being compiled
into a method. Without AOT compilation this shouldn't be happening, but I'm
surprised it's
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Marko Topolnik
marko.topol...@gmail.comwrote:
What exactly is getting compiled into a class here? Not the map itself, I
believe; that wouldn't even cause this error.
From general clues, the code that builds your config map is being compiled
into a method.
Hi,
I'm hitting a JIT compiler bug in IBM JDK 6 with the following code
(forcing JIT compilation using -Xjit:count=0):
(defprotocol FooProtocol
(do-something [x]))
(def foo
(reify FooProtocol
(do-something [this]
(locking this
(println XXX)
John,
That appears to be working. Thanks!
-- Clinton
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 12:04:38 AM UTC-4, John Hume wrote:
It looks like MimetypesFileTypeMap wants a path to a plain file. I can't
try this right now, but I think you want the constructor that takes an
InputStream. Something like
Alex, you are doing a wonderful job with the videos. InfoQ is helping us all by
making a business out of quality videos. From experience, I know there are
always people wanting things quicker and cheaper. I bet the same complains will
be here if the videos are releases in half the time.
Of
Hello, all,
There are just three days left to prepare our application for GSoC 2013.
Although we have a number of really good ideas up on our Project Ideas
page http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Project+Ideas, we really
need to do a lot more in order to strengthen our application.
By
Hi Paudi,
Which particular version of the IBM JDK are you running (java -version) and
have you checked if you are running the very latest version?
Thomas
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi Thomas,
This is occuring on every Linux and AIX version I've tried, SR9, SR11 and
SR12. I tried Java 7 but it seems Clojure is very broken on IBM Java 7.
Getting ClassFormatErrors when building Clojure itself there!
Paudi
On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 14:38:44 UTC, Thomas wrote:
Hi Paudi,
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 12:13:54 PM UTC+1, David Powell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Marko Topolnik
marko.t...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
What exactly is getting compiled into a class here? Not the map itself, I
believe; that wouldn't even cause this error.
From
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:19:08 PM UTC, Paudi Moriarty wrote:
Hi Thomas,
This is occuring on every Linux and AIX version I've tried, SR9, SR11 and
SR12. I tried Java 7 but it seems Clojure is very broken on IBM Java 7.
Getting ClassFormatErrors when building Clojure itself there!
Thanks for that, I'll have a look. Think it was SR3 on x86_64 I tried.
On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:09:43 UTC, Thomas wrote:
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:19:08 PM UTC, Paudi Moriarty wrote:
Hi Thomas,
This is occuring on every Linux and AIX version I've tried, SR9, SR11 and
SR12. I
I don't like the idea of infix math as a reader macro. Yeah prefix is weird
to read for complex expressions, but in such rare cases there are ordinary
macros that let you do infix math. Use them.
An interesting thought I had the other day regarding infix math:
It would be possible for Clojure
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Paudi Moriarty
pmoria...@annadaletech.comwrote:
IBM JDK 6 is part of the clojure build matrix (though the last stable
build is from over a year ago:
http://build.clojure.org/job/clojure-test-matrix/jdk=IBM%20JDK%201.6/lastStableBuild/
)
I don't have any
I'd guess that this would be a pretty big map to run to over 64k though -
though
I think Clojure has a single initialiser method that initialises all vars
in the
namespace, so it is tha total that is important.
It certainly seems as if it is the whole namespace that is being compiled.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:48 PM, larry google groups
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd guess that this would be a pretty big map to run to over 64k though
- though
I think Clojure has a single initialiser method that initialises all
vars in the
namespace, so it is tha total that is
Thanks for the comments. I've made the suggested changes such that the AWS
functions take an optional first parameter map of credentials. But I'm left
wondering if it should not be required, and just do away with the stateful
defcredential convenience. Thots?
On Monday, March 25, 2013
I'm a bit concerned about all the reflection going on. Am I correct that
the lib does dynamic dispatch at runtime based on both the arity and the
number of arguments? The code looks like it would be painfully slow.
Perhaps the hit is okay if I only want to make a dozen calls a second or
so, but if
Well, of course everything is handled via reflection, which has a cost. The
question is, can you afford the cost. In general, I think most of the AWS
apis really aren't concerned with performance, e.g. EC2, and you're not
making (many) repeated calls. If you look at something like DynamoDB
Michael Cohen mcohe...@gmail.com writes:
Well, of course everything is handled via reflection, which has a cost. The
question is, can you afford the cost.
Or can the cost be confined to compile time...
In general, I think most of the AWS
apis really aren't concerned with performance,
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:54:12 PM UTC+1, David Powell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:48 PM, larry google groups
lawrenc...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I'd guess that this would be a pretty big map to run to over 64k though
- though
I think Clojure has a single initialiser
Folks who use Leiningen on Windows, Leiningen maintainers need a little bit
of your help.
The Chocolatey Leiningen package maintainer can no longer support it and is
looking
to pass things on:
http://chocolatey.org/packages/leiningen
If you are familiar with Chocolatey, consider helping him out.
Hello all,
I have been searching and searching on how to do this but I am failing
miserably. I am trying to do a pretty simply thing actually.
I have the following vector:
[:foo :bar]
and a function that takes keywords as arguments, like so:
(my-function :foo :bar more)
What i am trying
2013/3/26 Ryan arekand...@gmail.com
What i am trying to do is to apply the elements of my vector as arguments
to the function. How can I achieve this?
user= (apply (fn [a b] (println a b)) [:a :b])
:a :b
nil
--
MK
http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
--
--
Thanks Michael, but If i am not mistaken, your example only works with a
vector with two elements. What if we have an unknown number of vector
elements?
My apologies if that wasn't clear on my first post.
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:38:55 PM UTC+2, Michael Klishin wrote:
2013/3/26 Ryan
Have you tried (apply my-function [:foo :bar]) yet? Because *apply* is
exactly what you are looking for; to make sure, read its docstring.
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:44:49 PM UTC+1, Ryan wrote:
Thanks Michael, but If i am not mistaken, your example only works with a
vector with two
Apply works for any number of args:
(apply + [1 2 3 4 5])
He just gave you an example inline function of 2 args since that was the
original example.
Alan Thompson
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Ryan arekand...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Michael, but If i am not mistaken, your example only
2013/3/26 Ryan arekand...@gmail.com
Thanks Michael, but If i am not mistaken, your example only works with a
vector with two elements. What if we have an unknown number of vector
elements?
My apologies if that wasn't clear on my first post.
If your function's signature allows for rest
You are mistaken :)
try:
(apply str [:a :b :c])
(apply str [:a :b :c :d :e])
(doc apply)
-
clojure.core/apply
([f args] [f x args] [f x y args] [f x y z args] [f a b c d args])
Applies fn f to the argument list formed by prepending intervening
arguments to args.
nil
Essentially, apply just removes the parens (or brackets) from your list of
args and creates the original function call:
(apply + [1 2 3]) - (+ 1 2 3)
Alan Thompson
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Alan Thompson thompson2...@gmail.comwrote:
Apply works for any number of args:
(apply +
On 26/03/13 19:28, Ryan wrote:
apply the elements of my vector as arguments to the function
you said it yourself in your first post... :) 'apply' is what you're
looking for!
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
Thank you guys for your answer. apply was the first thing I used but I got
the following error:
java.lang.ClassCastException: clojure.lang.Keyword cannot be cast to
clojure.lang.Associative
and i thought i am not going the right way. What i am more specifically
trying to do is this:
The docs there seem to imply that fields takes a keyword or a vector,
rather than a keyword or keywords. Try just (fields fields-vector), without
the apply.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Ryan arekand...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you guys for your answer. apply was the first thing I used but I
;;from the website you linked
(/fields/ [:firstname :first]:last :address.state)
;; you can alias a field using a vector of [field alias]
Your vector argument should look like this:
[[:firstname :first]:last :address.state]
or like this (if you're not aliasing):
[:firstname :last
Ah damn, you are right! Sorry if I wasted anyone's time :)
At least I learned that apply was the way to go in my original post
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:23:10 PM UTC+2, Cedric Greevey wrote:
The docs there seem to imply that fields takes a keyword or a vector,
rather than a keyword or
aaa see? always check the docs first and the sources second (if
available)...I should have done that as well :)
Jim
On 26/03/13 20:28, Ryan wrote:
Ah damn, you are right! Sorry if I wasted anyone's time :)
At least I learned that apply was the way to go in my original post
On Tuesday,
Category: Tooling
Name: Program analysis suite, based on Rich Hickey's Codeq
Brief explanation:
Rich Hickey, inventor of Clojure and Datomic, created Codeq as a
prototype framework for program analysis. It harvests multiple
information sources (eg, Git metadata, source
Well, I did check em but It wasn't clear to me that I could pass a vector;
I thought that was only for aliasing. Oh well, it happens I guess :)
Thanks again everybody!
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:30:48 PM UTC+2, Jim foo.bar wrote:
aaa see? always check the docs first and the sources second
Right now, Clojure is fighting its way to get to Java-like performance
for numerics, and that involves emitting primitive numbers and
operations whenever possible. I'm afraid that would be utterly
incompatible with turning numbers into functions - that would be at
least two levels of indirection
try (load-file hello.clj)
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:25:43 AM UTC-7, MC Andre wrote:
I tried setting *compile-path* to ., but Clojure still can't find
hello.clj.
Trace:
$ cat hello.clj
(ns hello
(:gen-class))
(defn -main [ args]
(println Hello World!\n))
$ lein repl
nREPL
I works for me if I run 'lein repl' *outside* of a project. In that case,
is on the classpath, so . looks in the current directory.
When you run 'lein repl' *inside* of a project, however, the top-level
project directory is not on the classpath. . in this case probably means
look in the
Hi, Allen.
My own version of with-redefs? That *sounds* kind of hard. Could you keep
an atom with the original bound value (the first one my-with-redefs sees,
anyway) and then always roll back to that value? Something like that?
Thanks,
Leif
On Monday, March 25, 2013 1:58:53 AM UTC-4,
Hi, Shantanu.
Thanks for the suggestions. A couple thoughts:
1. Many times, I seem to stub or mock things that are scattered here and
there in the code, like things that send email or log metrics, etc. so
they are not really isolated (or isolatable??), but I still want to test
that they get
2013/3/27 Jim - FooBar(); jimpil1...@gmail.com
aaa see? always check the docs first and the sources second (if
available)...I should have done that as well :)
Definitely don't just check the sources and think it's something normal.
Complain loudly to maintainers on this list that their
45 matches
Mail list logo
