Hello Ryan,
Thank you for the project, i was always missing a good static site
generator written in clojure !
You took some interesting design decisions with extensibility. I'm
currently working on the
similar project https://github.com/janherich/gutenberg, even if my design
is very
I have committed some update.
- org.clojure/clojure 1.4.0 -- 1.5.1
- compojure 1.1.4 -- 1.1.6
- ring 1.1.6 -- 1.2.1
- aleph 0.3.0-beta13 -- 0.3.0
- http-kit 1.3.0-alpha2 -- 2.1.16
- ring-netty-adapter 0.0.3 -- netty-ring-adapter 0.4.6
- remove testing about pure nginx which
Ah, of course, the mutex is not reentrant.
So, one possible way to fix the situation would be to close the owned
channel manually by resetting its closed atom to true. Thinking
through all the implications should make for an interesting exercise.
:-) (For example, I think cleanup is performed
Ah, I see - that makes sense, thanks.
On 14 January 2014 19:49, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
defn is a macro, and thus macro-expanded during Eastwood analysis, I
believe ignoring the :arglists. I think it is really only the :arglists of
functions that matter for Eastwood
I have done the first one. The result is
HEREhttps://github.com/ptaoussanis/clojure-web-server-benchmarks(
https://github.com/ptaoussanis/clojure-web-server-benchmarks )
Thanks Taoussanis for his invitation to the project
A sketch of a different approach:
alt! / alts! on the main channel and an extra channel with :priority
true when putting. Use an unblocking buffer in the extra channel. If
you end up putting on the extra channel, close the main channel.
(core.async channels can be closed multiple times.)
Here a
Just to avoid any possibility of giving the impression that I'm
offering the above as a well-tested component: I wouldn't actually use
closing-channel as defined above without giving much more thought to
all implications. The current version is just a quick sketch.
Also, if the alt! / alts!
Thanks for all the great links and ideas you have all posted, now I have
plenty of reading and thinking to do!
I am curious about what you mean by 'thread safety'.
Perhaps thread safety is the wrong term, but what I meant was the
limitations dynamic binding introduces around thread
On 14/01/14, James Trunk wrote:
I am curious about what you mean by 'thread safety'.
Perhaps thread safety is the wrong term, but what I meant was the
limitations dynamic binding introduces around thread dispatching, which
Stuart Sierra explains in this blog
Oh wow, that's fantastic!
For those watching: Xfeep's fixed a number of config issues, updated all
the servers, and completely updated the chart.
Absolutely well worth a look if you're interested in Clojure web server
performance.
* Results are here:
Hi,
Thanks for your work on nginx-clojure. It looks great!
As I know Nginx spawns many processes(correct me if I am wrong), does that
mean, there will be many JVM process?
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:44:18 PM UTC+8, Xfeep Zhang wrote:
I have done the first one. The result is
Hi, nginx-clojure looks great!
A small tip: ab may not be the best tool, since it's single threaded. A
better tool is wrk: https://github.com/wg/wrk
You can use wrk to better test nginx-clojure, It should perform even
better than others.
沈锋
http://shenfeng.me
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at
How can i println an index of a vector?
tryed.
(println vector index)
like
(println x 0)
dosnt work.
/ a swede.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
(println (v 0))
(v 0) would give you the element at index 0
(println ..) would print whatever you supply as its argument.
Cheers,
Omer
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Andreas Olsson photoguy@gmail.comwrote:
How can i println an index of a vector?
tryed.
(println vector index)
Cant get this to work.
(def sx2(atom [2 3 4]))
(println (sx2 3))
Den tisdagen den 14:e januari 2014 kl. 12:04:27 UTC+1 skrev Omer Iqbal:
(println (v 0))
(v 0) would give you the element at index 0
(println ..) would print whatever you supply as its argument.
Cheers,
Omer
On Tue, Jan
an atom cannot be used as a function! deref it first to get the vector
inside and then try again...
Jim
On 14/01/14 11:25, Andreas Olsson wrote:
Cant get this to work.
(def sx2(atom [2 3 4]))
(println (sx2 3))
Den tisdagen den 14:e januari 2014 kl. 12:04:27 UTC+1 skrev Omer Iqbal:
thanks... this works
(println ((deref sx2) 4))
Den tisdagen den 14:e januari 2014 kl. 12:29:02 UTC+1 skrev Jim foo.bar:
an atom cannot be used as a function! deref it first to get the vector
inside and then try again...
Jim
On 14/01/14 11:25, Andreas Olsson wrote:
Cant get this
You could also write:
(println (@sx2 4))
On 14 January 2014 11:35, Andreas Olsson photoguy@gmail.com wrote:
thanks... this works
(println ((deref sx2) 4))
Den tisdagen den 14:e januari 2014 kl. 12:29:02 UTC+1 skrev Jim foo.bar:
an atom cannot be used as a function! deref it first
Okay,..
..learning one step at a time hear. =)
I´m good at basic.. this is some thing else.
Den tisdagen den 14:e januari 2014 kl. 12:38:34 UTC+1 skrev James Reeves:
You could also write:
(println (@sx2 4))
On 14 January 2014 11:35, Andreas Olsson photog...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
You are welcome!
Yes, you are right. One JVM instance is embed per Nginx Worker process.
The number of Nginx Workers is generally the same with the number of CPU.
If one Worker crashs the Nginx Master will create a new one so you don't
worry about JVM crashs accidentally.
Although there
Unless you are worrying about concurrency, you probably don't need an atom
at all:
(def sx2 [2 3 4])
(println (sx2 1))
On 14 January 2014 14:45, Andreas Olsson photoguy@gmail.com wrote:
Okay,..
..learning one step at a time hear. =)
I´m good at basic.. this is some thing else.
Den
From my perspective, a buffer is below the abstraction level of a channel.
If you want a channel with special behavior, it seems like you should
implement a channel.
On Monday, January 13, 2014 10:47:22 PM UTC-6, t x wrote:
I am aware of:
DroppingBuffer and SliddingBuffer
I would like
Two notes:
1)The provided core.async go-loop macro is a small enhancement for the (go
(loop )) case.
2) Be careful using when using falsey tests like when or if - these will
stop on nil but will also stop on false coming through the channel. Might
be ok here, but it's something to be aware of.
You 're right!
ab has many limitations.
Maybe httpload , wrk, Weighttp or ABs ( several instances of AB) are
better when test client and server do not run on the same computer.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 5:52:59 PM UTC+8, Feng Shen wrote:
Hi, nginx-clojure looks great!
A small tip: ab
The only significant change is the bugfix MATCH-92, keywords with dots now
supported.
http://github.com/clojure/core.match
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
Hello!
When mapping and reducing a map, it seems arguments are passed differently
to the function that is mapped depending on whether you reduce with
r/reduce or r/fold:
(r/fold +
(r/map (fn [k v] (inc v)) {:a 4 :b 5}))
But:
(r/reduce +
(r/map (fn [[k v]] (inc v)) {:a 4 :b 5}))
The
The errors I'm getting indicate that the tables don't exist.
Table itinerary not found; SQL statement:
DELETE FROM itinerary [42102-164]
org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Table itinerary not found; SQL
statement:
DELETE FROM itinerary [42102-164]
at
This code actually results in a subtle race condition as channels need to
be locked internally. It also won't work for other implementations of
channel, of which there are several in core.async besides
ManytoManyChannel. (For example, map returns a reified channel.) Knowing
whether a channel
It's a known problem (putting into a closed channel), and one we have a
possible solution for (it's in one of the branches of core.async). I'll
bring it up this Friday and see if we can't make some progress on the code.
Timothy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Ghadi Shayban gshay...@gmail.com
Hi Michal,
After a good night's sleep, I've decided to not fight this battle at the
buffer layer.
However, I appreciate (1) the code you've written and (2) the initial
suggestion (which got me interested enough to dig into internals of
Channels.clj / Mutex.clj / ... )
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014
@Alex:
Noted.
In practice, it's not much of a problem to me, since objects I'm sending
over the channel are of the form:
{:tag :message
:return-chan ...
:data ... actual message }
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote:
Two notes:
1)The provided
@Ghadi,
Are you referring to the race condition between:
(check if channel is closed)
### BAM SOMETHING HAPPENS
(put something on to the channel)
?
I agree it's a race condition, however after some refactoring, I no longer
care if I'm !-ing onto a closed channel, as long as I eventually know
@Timothy:
Looking forward to your changes. Thanks for all the existing work with
core.async! (I was half tempted to switch to Scala to use Akka right before
core.async came out.)
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:30 AM, t x txrev...@gmail.com wrote:
@Ghadi,
Are you referring to the race condition
Hey Jan,
My decisions were mostly in an effort to reduce the number of hard
dependencies. If you do a search on the incise repository for
hiccuphttps://github.com/RyanMcG/incise/search?q=hiccupref=cmdform,
you'll see it is not used in any core functionality (besides server to
generate a trivial
I recently took the plunge into learning Clojure and love it. Since I
tend to be single-minded/all-or-nothing about these things I'm now
finding it very difficult to switch mindset when I have to work with
Ruby. Anyone else experienced this? If you get deeply into a programming
language it
Hi, Xfeep,
Thanks for your contribution, and the project looks interesting.
For me, the idea of driving ring webapp behind nginx is not new.
We use uwsgi to drive our ring app behind nginx in our production.
uwsgi support JVM and ring for almost one year, and I think the code is
relative stable
Hi Yves,
I guess it is because r/reduce calls r/reduce-kv (which is specific for
map), while r/fold it does not have such special handling
Filip
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:43:10 PM UTC+1, Yves Parès wrote:
Hello!
When mapping and reducing a map, it seems arguments are passed differently
Maybe don't switch mindset? Write code that looks like idiomatic ruby but
has what appears to rubyists as QWAN.
I think it's possible and maybe even desirable for bad things to feel more
foreign when your understanding increases.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:01 PM, gvim gvi...@gmail.com wrote:
I
I have felt your pain. I started life with Smalltalk and more or less
spent the last 15 years in Java. When I started Clojure, it was very hard
to break my thinking habits. Particularly, I was lost without manifest
typing. I didn't realize how much types documented my system and allowed
It's been the other way round for me. I always felt Ruby was doing too
much under the hood. So much so that I bought Ruby Under A Microscope
just to find out what was going on. I found it very easy to switch to
Clojure because everything is so much more transparent. Now Ruby just
feels awkward
I misread the critical piece of your post :) You are, indeed, a step ahead
of me
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:30:13 AM UTC-8, g vim wrote:
It's been the other way round for me. I always felt Ruby was doing too
much under the hood. So much so that I bought Ruby Under A Microscope
just
+1 here. I'm afraid the only solution I've found is to stop writing
Ruby. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Mark markaddle...@gmail.com wrote:
I misread the critical piece of your post :) You are, indeed, a step ahead
of me
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:30:13 AM UTC-8, g vim
On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:01 PM, gvim gvi...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently took the plunge into learning Clojure and love it. Since I tend to
be single-minded/all-or-nothing about these things I'm now finding it very
difficult to switch mindset when I have to work with Ruby. Anyone else
No, you're probably right. It's just that there never seem to be enough
hours in a day/life :(
gvim
On 14/01/2014 20:26, Bob Hutchison wrote:
No it’s not just you. Hardly! However, I’d caution you against allowing this
situation to continue. Preference is one thing. Isolating yourself from
On Jan 14, 2014, at 3:46 PM, gvim gvi...@gmail.com wrote:
No, you're probably right. It's just that there never seem to be enough hours
in a day/life :(
You’re not alone there either :-)
Cheers,
Bob
gvim
On 14/01/2014 20:26, Bob Hutchison wrote:
No it’s not just you. Hardly!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote:
2) Be careful using when using falsey tests like when or if - these will
stop on nil but will also stop on false coming through the channel. Might
be ok here, but it's something to be aware of.
Oooh! that is a really
On Jan 14, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Ivan L ivan.laza...@gmail.com wrote:
This is excellent work! I played around with cljs-start tonight, thanks so
much for your work.
I'm glad you find it useful.
One hopefully quick question. Assuming the CCW lein headless start and then
(run) and
Can you be more specific about what you did and what you would expect to
happen in that case?
-Phil
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
In ~/.lein/profiles.clj I have:
{:user {:plugins [[lein-ritz 0.7.0] [lein-ancient 0.5.4]]
:dependencies [[org.clojure/core.typed 0.2.21]
[org.clojure/core.match 0.2.0]
[co.paralleluniverse/pulsar 0.3.0]]}}
... and I
Verify with clojure.java.jdbc would by my first approach, but it's not
clear to me how you can know migratus and Korma aren't touching two
different instantiations of the H2 in memory database using c.j.j.
I don't know anything about H2. I'm a PostgreSQL user.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Hi Mingli,
Thanks for your suggestion.
Nginx-Clojure is quite different from uwsgi when supports JVM.
Nginx-Clojure make JVM embed into Nginx worker process. JVM and Nginx
worker have the same memory process space.
Nginx-Clojure heavy uses pointer operation just like C to handle memory
gvim writes:
... but after `lein deps :tree` the cljs profile still isn't loaded.
That's normal; you would need to run `lein with-profile cljs deps :tree`
to activate a profile. But if you have dependencies that are needed for
your project to compile, it's a very bad idea to omit them from
I have check the uwsgi document again and the JVM integration document is
HERE
http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/JWSGI.htmlhttp://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/JWSGI.html
.
When using uwsgi to integrate JVM, the JVM process is not the same process
of Nginx worker.
So it can
I think Light Table, Clojure, and ClojureScript users will find this guide
informative:
http://swannodette.github.io/2014/01/14/clojurescript-analysis--compilation/
Cheers,
David
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
Hi Mingli,
Thanks for your suggestion.
Nginx-Clojure is quite different from uwsgi when supports JVM.
Nginx-Clojure make JVM embed into Nginx worker process. JVM and Nginx
worker have the same memory process space.
Nginx-Clojure heavy uses pointer operation just like C to handle
How exactly are you running the code? The Gist really doesn't provide
enough information for anyone to be able to diagnose this...
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Christopher Allen c...@bitemyapp.com wrote:
Verify with clojure.java.jdbc would by my first approach, but it's not clear
to me how
56 matches
Mail list logo
