On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Evan Rowley rowley.e...@gmail.com wrote:
The question we have to ask is: Would use of a (specific?) functional
language prevented these? My opinion:
Probably not in the case of Mt. Gox because their problems had more to do
with their application design.
There
I would say the transaction model of datomic would have saved Mt Gox from
its problems dealing with atomic transactions, however that's more due to
datomic's design and poor design of the Mt Gox system than a clojure
specific thing.
On Monday, May 5, 2014 6:21:47 PM UTC+12, Magnus Therning
2014-05-04 15:50 GMT+02:00 Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com:
I highly recommend taking a look again at JavaFX2. The latest version
(released as part of Java 8 or as a separate jar with Java 7) has a very
unified API and is a joy to work with.
I've been hacking on a library that
2014-05-04 17:32 GMT+02:00 Gary Verhaegen gary.verhae...@gmail.com:
I'm no expert, but the arguments I have seen against Swing are
almost always about the API, so they do not really apply to seesaw.
The other arguments were about the non-native look, but I seem to remember
that seesaw took
From Java 7 onwards, JavaFX is part of the runtime. I strongly recommend you
take a look at JavaFX, the very regular and powerful API will allow you to
build innovative UIs.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send
2014-05-04 17:40 GMT+02:00 Evan Rowley rowley.e...@gmail.com:
Most functional languages have design features that enhance their
security. I'm referring to Clojure, Haskell, and Erlang, but this won't be
limited to those three. As someone who was hired to handle cyber security
needs of a
2014-05-04 21:59 GMT+02:00 Adam Saleh adamthecam...@gmail.com:
Well, what does it mean to write secure programs? Citation needed :)
Well, the statement was that for secure programming you needed to program
modular. It was hinted that when you program functional you can not program
modular. I
2014-05-04 23:40 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 09:24:08AM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I heard the stand that functional programming made it difficult to
write secure programs. I do not know enough of functional
programming yet to determine the
2014-05-05 5:48 GMT+02:00 Wei Hsu yayits...@gmail.com:
Perhaps Cecil is referring to this article, Clojure web security is worse
than you
thinkhttps://hackworth.be/2014/03/26/clojure-web-security-is-worse-than-you-think/,
describing
the immature state of Clojure's web security libraries. I
2014-05-05 8:21 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
any language ;) However, choosing language wisely will allow you to
concentrate on solving the 'real' problem at hand, and relieve you
from solving unrelated problems (memory management, dealing with
pointers, etc). It will also
2014-05-05 9:56 GMT+02:00 Fabien Todescato fabien.todesc...@gmail.com:
From Java 7 onwards, JavaFX is part of the runtime. I strongly recommend
you take a look at JavaFX, the very regular and powerful API will allow you
to build innovative UIs.
I see you are right. Two problems:
- Can I
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-04 23:40 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 09:24:08AM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I heard the stand that functional programming made it difficult to
write secure
I'm not sure it's relevant, but one thing that caught me out is that the
interruptible-eval middleware has a hard dependency on the pr-values
middleware (i.e. it depends
on #'clojure.tools.nrepl.middleware.pr-values/pr-values). I found this
caused trouble when I was trying to insert my own
David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com writes:
There's no easy way to do this beyond making your own relational
string type as you've suggested.
FWIW, I had the same need as Adam and the poor-man's solution below is
enough for my use-case.
--8---cut
So it turns out this is an ordering problem. I worked around it by first
compiling the namespace containing the protocol, and then the namespace
using it. I guess there's a bug in the transitive compilation.
Cheers,
Colin
On 3 May 2014 21:52, Colin Fleming colin.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks to both of you, your answers were very helpful!
Regards,
Deyan
On 05/04/2014 11:28 PM, Akos Gyimesi wrote:
Hi Deyan,
I also think that it's usually better to have a standalone Clojure app
with a built-in HTTP server, and possibly with a reverse proxy as a
frontend. You will have
To clarify slightly, the Java Language Specification section 5.1.7 requires
that the implementation cache *boxed* ints from -128 to 127, boolean
true/false, and characters from \u and \u007f. Because Clojure defaults
to boxing in many cases you'll see the same effect.
The persistent
(There are now three recent threads on documentation in the Clojure Google
group*. *The other threads are Code Genres and Deep Thinking. It was
actually *da...@axiom-developer.org's May* 4 post in Deep Thinking that
stimulated these remarks; I posted in this thread only because
it has
Hi Roelof,
I start the 4Clojure exercises and I did a little project so I can keep a
record of my solutions. It's really simple but also I've found it really
helpful to see where my errors are.
You can fork it from here... if you want.
https://github.com/erlis/4Clojure
You only have there the
Is there an :autotest for test.check with Leiningen?
Something like midje, where you can do: lein midje :autotest
Many thanks,
boz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
I've never seen synthread. I'll investigate in probably a few days.
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Jozef Wagner jozef.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for releasing this library. How does it compare to the synthread
library [1] [2] ? Seems like both libraries have the same goal.
Jozef
[1]
2014-05-05 12:05 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-05-04 23:40 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 09:24:08AM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I heard the
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-05-04 23:40 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 09:24:08AM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Mars0i marsh...@logical.net wrote:
...
the end, there are no fixed rules. Just figure out what your readers or
students need, however you do it.
That's exactly what good documentation involves: Figuring out what other
programmers will need when they read your
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-05 8:21 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
any language ;) However, choosing language wisely will allow you to
concentrate on solving the 'real' problem at hand, and relieve you
from solving
Could you explain me why after
clients;; = {#AsyncChannel
/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%0:-/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%0:60071 true}
(into {} clients) ; = #ManyToManyChannel
clojure.core.async.impl.channels.ManyToManyChannel@5d9c832a
I get IllegalArgumentException java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No
I'm wondering if there is a way to generate Clojure executables/jars
without the embedded Clojure compiler/interpreter. In older lisps there is
usually the option to generate an executable with unused bits of the
language expunged for performance reasons. Clojurescript already sort of
works
There's a GSOC project to this effect:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Project+Ideas#ProjectIdeas-LeanJVMRuntime
Reid McKenzie's going to be working on it.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Stine stine.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a way to generate Clojure
Can you put the sourcecode in refheap or gist? I can't make sense of your
initial post.
Timothy
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Valentin Luchko akme...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you explain me why after
clients;; = {#AsyncChannel
/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%0:-/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%0:60071 true}
(into
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 10:53:40 AM UTC-4, Bob Hutchison wrote:
On May 3, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Dave Tenny dave@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I'm still struggling with how to write the most readable, simple clojure
code
to deal with dynamically bindings.
What is the graceful clojure
Sometimes you do want a mutable thing with thread-local binding, noir does
this for it's mutable session-flash stuff:
https://github.com/noir-clojure/lib-noir/blob/master/src/noir/session.clj#L95
I don't really recommend the approach, but I could see it being convenient.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at
I would never have guessed modularity as a reason to worry about security
in fp.
I worry about immutability in fp, wrt security. Security requires
mutability in order to remove sensitive data from memory, and from app
history. A FIPS review, for example, requires demonstrating where in your
Responses inlined ...
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Atamert Ölçgen mu...@muhuk.com wrote:
Hello Timothy,
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Timothy Washington twash...@gmail.comwrote:
Also, have you tried confirming that only one :a is instantiated?
That one *:a* is not the same
Thanks Gary, Leif, Alex!
I suspected memoization might be the way to go—the leap I needed to make
was: writing my own data constructors.
On Monday, May 5, 2014 9:10:40 AM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote:
To clarify slightly, the Java Language Specification section 5.1.7
requires that the
I have Clojure 1.6.0 installed so why does `lein new app myapp` default
to Clojure 1.5.1 inside project.clj? Even worse, `lein ancient upgrade
:all` doesn't return an upgrade for Clojure 1.5.1
gvim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To
At what point did you **create** the Atom in :a? Any mutable references
which need to be shared among all usages of a component must be created in
the **constructor**, not the `start` or `stop` methods.
-S
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 5:13:15 PM UTC-4, frye wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a
The default lein template has clojure 1.5.1 hardcoded. It will only change
when it's updated there.
You can check the lein ancient help with `lein help ancient`. There you
will find how to include clojure on the verification.
HTH,
Marcelo
On Monday, May 5, 2014 4:10:38 PM UTC-3, g vim wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the SAT4J java library (http://www.sat4j.org) from
Clojure.
I've create a clojure app with lein new app sat4j-app
I've edited the project.clj file to :
(defproject sat4j-app 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT
:description FIXME: write description
:url http://example.com/FIXME;
:license
The default leiningen templates have already been updated to Clojure 1.6.0:
https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/commit/a296ff8918a581c975f49127d7e37a3f0c510d22
However, I don't think that change will be visible till the next lein
release.
On Monday, May 5, 2014 3:08:56 PM UTC-5, mynomoto
The form should be:
(:import [org.sat4j.core Vec]) ; note the square braces.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Ronan BARZIC rbar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the SAT4J java library (http://www.sat4j.org) from
Clojure.
I've create a clojure app with lein new app sat4j-app
I've
Here is the gist
https://gist.github.com/valichek/ba510de9ff2cf3d0c502
P.S. sorry if my first post was odd
понедельник, 5 мая 2014 г., 20:03:09 UTC+3 пользователь Valentin Luchko
написал:
Could you explain me why after
clients;; = {#AsyncChannel
Concerning the workflow with the ajax-login... for some reason the
middleware to set params with json body of my POST isn't working.
As a workaround I added this to ajax-login, to parse the params:
(checore/parse-string (slurp (:body request)) true)
I had also to remove the
Ahh, so that was it then. Yeah, I definitely created that atom in the start
method.
Thanks very much.
Tim Washington
Interruptsoftware.com http://interruptsoftware.com
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stuart Sierra
the.stuart.sie...@gmail.comwrote:
At what point did you **create** the Atom
(middleware/wrap-json-params) slurps the body up completely - this
is a mutation, so you won't be able to access the body again.
Ivan Schuetz mailto:ivanschu...@gmail.com
May 5, 2014 3:49 PM
Concerning the workflow with the ajax-login... for some reason the
middleware to set params with
The snippet provided by Eric doesn't use the body... it returns a function
that accepts params as argument, but they were not being passed... body was
set instead, that's why I added slurp.
So maybe there's something wrong with the (middleware/wrap-json-params),
because it's evidently not
Sorry. I mean accepts the request map as an argument. This map doesn't
contain the parameters.
Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2014 02:17:52 UTC+2 schrieb Ivan Schuetz:
The snippet provided by Eric doesn't use the body... it returns a function
that accepts params as argument, but they were not being
My question would be: why do you specifically need a list? i.e., why isn't a
sequence good enough?
Sean
On May 3, 2014, at 6:30 AM, Dave Tenny dave.te...@gmail.com wrote:
After nosing around all I've come up with via clojure mechanisms is to use
(apply list (sort ...)).
It seems to work
A specific case: when I worked at Adobe, we could not use any open source
library whose license was not one of a standard set of pre-approved licenses.
During a license audit (oh joy!) I had to approach a couple of OSS projects we
had started to use in order to persuade them to change their
Hi,
I'm using clojure.zip to edit a tree by visiting each location using
zip/next, possibly using zip/replace to alter the tree.
There are cases where I replace a part of the tree with another tree that
will/must not be visited, but I couldn't find a good way to skip nodes,
since
(zip/next
49 matches
Mail list logo
