In judge try changing
(let [out async/chan] ...)
to
(let [out (async/chan)] ...)
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 5:57:53 AM UTC+2, endbegin wrote:
Just tried it with Clojure 1.6.0. Still no luck!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
2014-07-09 2:24 GMT+02:00 Bruce Wang br...@brucewang.net:
You might want to check out this
https://github.com/quux00/land-of-lisp-in-clojure
I will look into it. But I learn most if I do it myself. ;-)
--
Cecil Westerhof
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
2014-07-09 5:11 GMT+02:00 Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com:
Prefer vectors over quoted lists '(1 2) vs [1 2]. There's rarely a case
(outside of macros) that you want the former.
Instead of quoted lists of symbols: '(You cannot get that.) try strings
You cannot get that
That is what
2014-07-09 5:30 GMT+02:00 John Mastro john.b.mas...@gmail.com:
Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
- The book displays all the lines of a look on separate lines. In my
case it is just one long line. Am I doing something wrong?
No, you're not doing anything wrong. There's nothing
2014-07-09 4:19 GMT+02:00 Bob Hutchison hutch-li...@recursive.ca:
On Jul 8, 2014, at 7:08 PM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-07-08 23:11 GMT+02:00 Bob Hutchison hutch-li...@recursive.ca:
On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com
wrote:
In
2014-07-09 9:39 GMT+02:00 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com:
Or you could use a definition of look more like this, which uses println
to print each item on its own line (not sure if you wanted to retain the
parens or not, but both are easily doable).
(defn look []
(doseq [d
By the way, how does Clojure-Scheme hand the Clojures's libraries over to
Gambit-C?
2012년 3월 15일 목요일 오전 6시 8분 2초 UTC+9, Nathan Sorenson 님의 말:
I've modified the output of the ClojureScript compiler to emit Scheme
code. At this point the core library is successfully compiled by Gambit
True, but I think that's why he argues for a strict language which controls
side effects via monads, as Haskell does.
On 9 July 2014 07:18, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:39:30PM +0200, Colin Fleming wrote:
I searched for this as well, and found this:
Hi, I am new to Clojure (about a week) so I might be missing something.
I want to use the (positions)
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_contrib/clojure.contrib.seq/positions function
from clojure.contrib.seq.
I could simply copy its source, but I would prefer a more generic way of
using functions
My new project is coming along nicely already. I'm currently using XHR
calls to populate atoms on the client side, which are then automatically
rendered into the DOM via Reagent components. It's wonderful, so far.
--
Jonathon McKitrick
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Ahmad Hammad
Pierre:
The link to the page Where did Clojure.Contrib Go on the page where you
noted that clojure.contrib is deprecated gives the names of current
modular contrib libraries that contain most or all of what *some* older
clojure.contrib libraries contained.
Unfortunately clojure.contrib.seq has
2014-07-09 10:38 GMT+02:00 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com:
2014-07-09 9:39 GMT+02:00 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com:
Or you could use a definition of look more like this, which uses println
to print each item on its own line (not sure if you wanted to retain the
parens or
Thank you Andy, that's exactly the answer I needed.
I thought I might be missing the right place where to look, because I'm
new to the ecosystem.
http://crossclj.info
http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fcrossclj.infosa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNG-DyQUTVfpaTQKl0M8glmTtO-tMQ
is
a very good resource
There's also a version of what you wrote (at least something very similar),
where one can specify libraries he wants docs for and have it all running
either locally or on some webserver: https://github.com/ifesdjeen/gizmo-cloc
Adds code snippets with highlights and lucene-backed search.
On
Hello everyone!
I just wanted to announce cats: category theory abstractions library for
clojure(script).
Why another library?
You can see a list of differences with existing libraries here:
http://niwibe.github.io/cats/#_why_another_library
Github: https://github.com/niwibe/cats
Documentation:
Thanks!! That did it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this
When you have:
(def object-locations {
'whiskey 'living-room
'bucket'living-room
'chain 'garden
'frog 'garden
'dummy 'nowhere
'test 'nowhere
})
You can retrieve the location of the bucket with:
(object-locations 'bucket)
and with:
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 10:39:47 AM UTC-4, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Phillip Lord philli...@newcastle.ac.uk
javascript: wrote:
Trivial things that I would like to be able to do that I cannot do (in a
way which will be reliably interpreted).
- Add hyperlinks
Short and simple answer: NullPointerException
(def object-locations nil)
(object-locations 'bucket) will throw
('bucket object-locations) = nil
HTH,
/thomas
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 3:48:53 PM UTC+2, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When you have:
(def object-locations {
'whiskey
Oh and its rare (outside of macros) to use symbols like that. Usually you'd
use keywords.
(def object-locations
{:whiskey :living-room})
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Heller th.hel...@gmail.com wrote:
Short and simple answer: NullPointerException
(def object-locations nil)
2014-07-09 17:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller th.hel...@gmail.com:
Short and simple answer: NullPointerException
(def object-locations nil)
(object-locations 'bucket) will throw
('bucket object-locations) = nil
That is interesting.
Not a problem, because it will never be nil, but always a
2014-07-09 17:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller th.hel...@gmail.com:
Oh and its rare (outside of macros) to use symbols like that. Usually
you'd use keywords.
(def object-locations
{:whiskey :living-room})
It is from 'Land of Lisp'. The symbols are printed. Or is it possible to
print the
(name :foo)
will return the name as a string
(symbol (name :foo))
Converts the name of the keyword to a symbol
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-07-09 17:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller th.hel...@gmail.com:
Oh and its rare (outside of macros) to
Don't know Land of Lisp, but if you print it you can use (name :whiskey) to
get whiskey (as a String), also works on (name 'whiskey).
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-07-09 17:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller th.hel...@gmail.com:
Oh and its rare
2014-07-09 17:32 GMT+02:00 Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com:
(name :foo)
will return the name as a string
(symbol (name :foo))
Converts the name of the keyword to a symbol
It is not even necessary. I changed to keywords. The code uses:
`(You see a ~obj on the floor.)
And it
2014-07-09 17:50 GMT+02:00 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com:
2014-07-09 17:32 GMT+02:00 Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com:
(name :foo)
will return the name as a string
(symbol (name :foo))
Converts the name of the keyword to a symbol
It is not even necessary. I changed to
Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
I read a little about it. And no, I do not use dynamic binding. So I
probably should use atoms. Is there a convention how to name atoms?
Nope, none that I've come across anyway. Dynamic variables can have very
surprising effects if you're not aware
Hi,
I tried to create the function below in a Lighttable instarepl. In lieu of
any better idea for formatting, thestatements below indicate
instarepl output.
(defn avged ([x]
((def sumed (reduce + x)) 10
(def counted (count x)) 4
(def result (/ sumed counted)) 5/2
result
)))
(avged
About code style, don't do defs inside of a function - this binds them
inside the entire namespace, so your values are escaping and persisting
when you just want locals. Use let:
(defn averaged [x]
(let [summed (reduce + x)
counted (count x)]
(/ summed counted)))
That function
On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Stephen Feyrer stephen.fey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried to create the function below in a Lighttable instarepl. In lieu of
any better idea for formatting, thestatements below indicate instarepl
output.
(defn avged ([x]
((def sumed (reduce + x)) 10
On Jul 9, 2014, at 9:31 PM, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
You could patch (not recommended!) this by adding do to the beginning of
that list:
Or -- I now see, instead of adding the do you could just remove the outermost
parentheses after the parameter list. But as Sam and I said
31 matches
Mail list logo
