Yes, because locally you are in the repl already. The repl in production is
brought in explicitly to be able to login/debug remotely into the
application where it’s hosted.
Does that make sense?
On Friday, October 10, 2014 7:13:39 AM UTC+3, Atamert Ölçgen wrote:
prod-system has a REPL but
I'm playing around with Gloss, trying to decode a packet, part of which has the
following nested struture:
header-length (1 byte, value n)
byte0 ... byten (count defined by that header-length byte)
actual payload (length of which is the sum of the values of the
above bytes)
I also know that Birkbeck College University of London is going to be
teaching Clojure this year.
On Oct 10, 2014 12:01 AM, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
FWIW I'm another person using Clojure mostly for academic research. And
for computer science education, e.g. I'm currently
For clarity, can you confirm the relationship between this and ring and
compojure? Am I right in saying the defined routes are ring compatible
(using domkm.silk.serve) and therefore silk is a replacement for compojure
(albeit compojure has some more middleware utilities)?
I understand I can
+1.
Or even worse, this is an opportunity to be put on yet another recruiter’s
automated job listing email :).
If this is some initiative for knowledge reaping/sharing in terms of
Clojure best practices/engineering practices then why not use one of the
many transparent mechanism (like this
Hi Ben,
That's pretty nifty indeed! Maybe a tad memory intensive as it retains the
head, but if it were a more complex, CPU intensive calculation in :next,
that might be very worthwhile. Good stuff.
Cheers,
-Arnout
P.S. The memory consumption will be a little less when I think of a way to
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Szmulewicz
daniel.szmulew...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, because locally you are in the repl already. The repl in production
is brought in explicitly to be able to login/debug remotely into the
application where it’s hosted.
Does that make sense?
Makes
ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code.
README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
New release version: 0.0-2371
Leiningen dependency information:
[org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-2371]
This release includes minor fixes, faster collection
Hi David,
thanks once again for the continuous effort to improve the ClojureScript
compiler.
Some warnings are now printed when using a specific `include-macros` syntax. I
wanted to confirm that this syntax was indeed incorrect.
An example is: [secretary.core :as secretary :include-macros true
(:require [secretary.core :as secretary :include-macros true])
; desugars to add= (:require-macros [secretary.core :as secretary])
(:require [secretary.core :as secretary :refer-macros [defroute])
; desugars to add= (:require-macros [secretary.core :as secretary :refer
[defroute]])
This
0.2.6 (2014-10-10)
1. Fix Bug: rewrite handler does not handle write event correctly with
thread pool mode or coroutine mode (issue #43)
2. Fix Bug: built-in jvm variable #{pno} doesn't work (issue #44)
3. Fix Bug: rewrite_handler_name does not work without content handler
Hi xfeep,
Thanks for the work! Looks awesome. Unfortunately the github website appears to
be broken in FF32 (displays fine in Chrome).
cheers
lvh
On 10 Oct 2014, at 16:03, Xfeep xfe...@gmail.com wrote:
0.2.6 (2014-10-10)
• Fix Bug: rewrite handler does not handle write event
I am pleased to annouce the 1.2.0 release of Tawny-OWL, now available on
clojars and github (http://github.com/phillord/tawny-owl).
What is Tawny-OWL
=
Tawny-OWL allows construction of OWL ontologies, in a evaluative, functional
and fully programmatic environment. Think of it
I'm extremely happy to announce the release of Pedestal 0.3.1
In this release you'll find many goodies:
* NIO support
* Immutant added as a platform type
* Transit support
* Improved SSE capabilities
* A new route format
* And more
Please see the official release notes for all of the
Hi ivh
Thanks for your notice.
Do you mean http://nginx-clojure.github.io/ appears to be broken in FF32 ?
I can not reproduce it.
Could you please give more information about it by reporting an issue at
https://github.com/nginx-clojure/nginx-clojure.github.io/issues/new ?
Thanks.
I’ve been using silk in conduction with compojure. Most middleware aren’t
compojure specific, but I’ve just found it easier to stick with base level
compojure routes and then pass uris to silk for pattern matching. This is
mostly because there is such a wealth of documentation and examples
What information do you want after this is decoded? Do you want the sum of
byte0 ... byten, as well as the actual payload? Do you also want the
header-length?
On Thursday, October 9, 2014 11:34:59 PM UTC-7, Ken Restivo wrote:
I'm playing around with Gloss, trying to decode a packet, part of
I have an arbitrarily nested EDN value stored in an atom in ClojureScript.
What is the best way to make edits to an arbitrary subtree of this value?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Can you use update-in or assoc-in?
On Friday, October 10, 2014 2:28:26 PM UTC-4, Dustin Getz wrote:
I have an arbitrarily nested EDN value stored in an atom in ClojureScript.
What is the best way to make edits to an arbitrary subtree of this value?
--
You received this message because you
So I'm reading a bunch of rows from a huge csv file and marshalling those
rows into maps using the first row as keys. I wrote the function two
ways: https://gist.github.com/MichaelBlume/c67d22df0ff9c225d956 and the
version with eval is twice as fast and I'm kind of curious about why.
I took a stab at it for 10 minutes, but I'm way too rusty.
Last year I implemented the blockchain wire protocol with gloss that might
be helpful: https://gist.github.com/danneu/7397350
Here's the spec: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification
The var-int-codec is a somewhat complex
Hi Laurens
Are you trying to access http or https? If you use HTTPSEverywhere like me,
the browser will try to load the https version, that really doesn't work
and you'll see only an horizontal strip.
I hope it can help you
Xfeep: thank you very much. I'm moving my web applications to
Hello,
Can you show the code you use for benchmarking?
Le vendredi 10 octobre 2014, Michael Blume blume.m...@gmail.com a écrit :
So I'm reading a bunch of rows from a huge csv file and marshalling those
rows into maps using the first row as keys. I wrote the function two ways:
It may be more to do with the difference between `for` and `map`. How do these
versions compare in your benchmark:
(defn read-to-maps-partial [rows]
(let [headers (-
rows
first
(take-while (complement #{}))
(map keyword))]
I believe it's because the `mapper` function is just creating and returning
a map literal. The mapper function in the evaled version is something
like this:
user (def names '[n1 n2 n3 n4])
#'user/names
user (def headers '[h1 h2 h3 h4])
#'user/headers
user `(fn [[~@names]] ~(zipmap headers names))
https://github.com/MichaelBlume/eval-speed
eval-speed.core= (time-fn read-to-maps)
Elapsed time: 5551.011069 msecs
nil
eval-speed.core= (time-fn read-to-maps-fn)
Elapsed time: 5587.256991 msecs
nil
eval-speed.core= (time-fn read-to-maps-partial)
Elapsed time: 5606.649172 msecs
nil
Did you run it enough times to fully warm up the JVM?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Michael Blume blume.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
https://github.com/MichaelBlume/eval-speed
eval-speed.core= (time-fn read-to-maps)
Elapsed time: 5551.011069 msecs
nil
eval-speed.core= (time-fn read-to-maps-fn)
Ah, interesting... I hadn't considered it was running the zipmap at
compile-time so it only runs it once as opposed to running it for each row!
Sean
On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it's because the `mapper` function is just creating and returning a
it's not quite at compile-time (since it's a dynamic call to eval, after
all, and names and headers aren't known at compile time), but it is
calling it eval-time, for lack of a better phrase.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Sean Corfield s...@corfield.org wrote:
Ah, interesting... I hadn't
On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
it's not quite at compile-time (since it's a dynamic call to eval, after all,
and names and headers aren't known at compile time), but it is calling it
eval-time, for lack of a better phrase.
Yes, I meant when it compiles the
I'd be interested in a site that lists examples of academic projects in
Clojure. (I know of a few Clojure projects in areas of interest to me.)
But only a little bit interested--not enough for me to create such a site.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I think it *is* a beautiful macro.
On Sep 14, 2014, at 7:45 AM, adrian...@mail.yu.edu javascript: wrote:
Friendly advice: when you describe anything you create with adjectives
like beautiful, it comes off as unnecessarily arrogant to native English
speakers.
Adrian
On Sunday, September
On Saturday, September 13, 2014 9:01:53 AM UTC-5, Lee wrote:
So now one of my first steps when I'm faced with a confusing bug is to
stamp out all of the laziness except where I'm really doing things lazily
on purpose, for a good reason. I've also come to think that the
pervasiveness and
Hi All,
I've been optimising a piece of code lately, and have come to wonder about
the performance of keyword comparison. Specifically, I'm not sure whether
the performance I'm seeing is what is expected. The data structures page on
clojure.org [1] indicates that keywords provide very fast
If this is the unofficial survey post of academics using Clojure then I'd
better add myself to the list :-)
@Bruce do you know what course they're going to be teaching Clojure on at
Birkbeck?
Jony
On Friday, 10 October 2014 08:08:28 UTC+1, Bruce Durling wrote:
I also know that Birkbeck
On Friday, October 10, 2014 5:20:30 PM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote:
Maybe an ideal world would be one in which there was a global setting to
turn laziness on and off. When you want it, have it, and know your risks.
After looking at the source for some of the lazy functions, I've come to
Zipmap doesn't use transients, so calling it at runtime will be
significantly slower than constructing a literal map.
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1005
On Friday, October 10, 2014 11:42:14 AM UTC-7, Michael Blume wrote:
So I'm reading a bunch of rows from a huge csv file and
I've been optimising a piece of code lately, and have come to wonder about
the performance of keyword comparison. Specifically, I'm not sure whether the
performance I'm seeing is what is expected. The data structures page on
clojure.org [1] indicates that keywords provide very fast
Hi Balduino,
Thank you.
This site use CDN http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-1.11.0.min.js
for
jquery , so for security the browser won't load these javascript source
when we access it by HTTPS.
Regards.
Xfeep
On Saturday, October 11, 2014 3:11:52 AM UTC+8, Plinio Balduino wrote:
We fixed this problem now.
Both https://nginx-clojure.github.io/ and http://nginx-clojure.github.io/
can work now.
Regards.
Xfeep
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Xfeep xfe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Balduino,
Thank you.
This site use CDN
40 matches
Mail list logo
